ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
Eddy-current-induced distortion correction using maximum reconciled mutual information in diffusion MR imaging.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focused ultrasound using a novel targeting method four-tract tractography for magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound targeting.Brain communications · 2022Article
- CEPS: An Open Access MATLAB Graphical User Interface (GUI) for the Analysis of Complexity and Entropy in Physiological Signals.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn diffusion tensor imaging, a large number of diffusion-weighted (DW) images with different diffusion gradient directions are attained during scanning. However, subjects' involuntary head movements and eddy current effect related to large diffusion-sensitizing gradients will cause distortions of DW images. Therefore, for tracking accurately white matter structures and tractography, the distortions have to be realigned before model fitting. Currently, traditional methods use maximum mutual information (MMI) or normalized mutual information (NMI) as similarity measure for DW images registration. These information measures are defined by Shannon entropy. The image entropy is able to embody the global information complexity but ignore the local information complexity caused by heterogeneous intensity contrasts in DW images, making registration algorithm early converge.
methodTo overcome the above problem, we present maximum reconciled mutual information (MRMI) combining both global information and local information as the similarity measure of the registration algorithm framework.
result(i) In comparison with traditional methods, under our proposed MRMI method, the border of DW image is more anastomotic with the b0 image, and the fitted fractional anisotropy (FA) map after registration is closer to the true brain boundary. (ii) By quantitative analysis of registration results, our method has a significant advantage over others in terms of NMI between b0 image and the aligned DW images.
conclusionThe results suggest that there is a high-level matching in space between the b0 image and the DW images aligned by the MRMI method, raising the registration robustness and accuracy compared to the traditional DW registration methods. It may provide a better option for the existing diffusion image registration tools (e.g., FMRIB Software Library) and commonly multimodal medical image registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30684107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.