ReviewJournal of medical systems2019
A Conceptual Framework and Pilot Study for Examining Telemedicine Satisfaction Research.
Review in Journal of medical systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- PROTOCOL: The Value of Rural Provider-To-Provider Telehealth for Emergency and Inpatient Care: An Evidence and Gap Map.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Global Evidence on the Sustainability of Telemedicine in Outpatient and Primary Care During the First 2 Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review Using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Brazilian dental teleconsulting: dentist satisfaction and associated factors.Brazilian oral research · 2025Article
- Telehealth Satisfaction in Patients Receiving Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Care: Quantitative Exploratory Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in acute care setting: A systematic review.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2022Review
- Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction Dimensions Moderated by Patient Demographics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- COVID-19 Lessons From The Field: Toward A Pediatric Physical Therapy Telehealth Framework.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2022Article
- User Experience in Remote Surgical Consultation: Survey Study of User Acceptance and Satisfaction in Real-Time Use of a Telemedicine Service.JMIR human factors · 2021Article
- Forecasting care seekers satisfaction with telemedicine using machine learning and structural equation modeling.PloS one · 2021Article
- A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stakeholder satisfaction is often considered a key to the success of telemedicine systems. However, it can be difficult to understand and compare satisfaction evaluations because of variations in reporting and study designs. This research will contribute to the knowledge by developing a conceptual framework around key concepts that relate to understanding studies on telemedicine satisfaction. The framework is built based on a developmental review of the telemedicine and telehealth literature obtained from searches of PubMed and Google Scholar. Using a conceptual matrix, researchers have synthesized the results into a framework that includes: satisfaction dimensions, stakeholders, type of care, type of system, context and methodologies. This research expands these concepts by discussing attributes of each and tests the framework by conducting a pilot study that identifies the concepts in primary study sources. The results of the framework and the pilot study are reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30684065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.