Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30684038›Full record

ArticlePlanta2019

Distinctive phytohormonal and metabolic profiles of Arabidopsis thaliana and Eutrema salsugineum under similar soil drying.

Carla Pinheiro, Elizabeth Dickinson, Andrew Marriott, Isa C Ribeiro, Marta Pintó-Marijuan, Carla António, Olfa Zarrouk, Maria Manuela Chaves, Ian C Dodd, Sergi Munné-Bosch and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carla PinheiroInstituto de Tecnologia Química E Biológica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. da República, EAN, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal. cm.pinheiro@fct.unl.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-0183
Elizabeth DickinsonDepartment of Mathematics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Andrew MarriottDepartment of Mathematics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Isa C RibeiroInstituto de Tecnologia Química E Biológica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. da República, EAN, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Marta Pintó-MarijuanInstituto de Tecnologia Química E Biológica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. da República, EAN, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Carla AntónioInstituto de Tecnologia Química E Biológica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. da República, EAN, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Olfa ZarroukInstituto de Tecnologia Química E Biológica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. da República, EAN, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Maria Manuela ChavesInstituto de Tecnologia Química E Biológica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. da República, EAN, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Ian C DoddThe Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Sergi Munné-BoschDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avinguda Diagonal 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Jane Thomas-OatesDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Julie WilsonDepartment of Mathematics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. julie.wilson@york.ac.uk.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/K039660/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/M028127/1ITQB NOVA R&D GREEN-it UID/Multi/04551/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionsArabidopsis and Eutrema show similar stomatal sensitivity to drying soil. In Arabidopsis, larger metabolic adjustments than in Eutrema occurred, with considerable differences in the phytohormonal responses of the two species. Although plants respond to soil drying via a series of concurrent physiological and molecular events, drought tolerance differs greatly within the plant kingdom. While Eutrema salsugineum (formerly Thellungiella salsuginea) is regarded as more stress tolerant than its close relative Arabidopsis thaliana, their responses to soil water deficit have not previously been directly compared. To ensure a similar rate of soil drying for the two species, daily soil water depletion was controlled to 5-10% of the soil water content. While partial stomatal closure occurred earlier in Arabidopsis (Day 4) than Eutrema (from Day 6 onwards), thereafter both species showed similar stomatal sensitivity to drying soil. However, both targeted and untargeted metabolite analysis revealed greater response to drought in Arabidopsis than Eutrema. Early peaks in foliar phytohormone concentrations and different sugar profiles between species were accompanied by opposing patterns in the bioactive cytokinin profiles. Untargeted analysis showed greater metabolic adjustment in Arabidopsis with more statistically significant changes in both early and severe drought stress. The distinct metabolic responses of each species during early drought, which occurred prior to leaf water status declining, seemed independent of later stomatal closure in response to drought. The two species also showed distinct water usage, with earlier reduction in water consumption in Eutrema (Day 3) than Arabidopsis (Day 6), likely reflecting temporal differences in growth responses. We propose Arabidopsis as a promising model to evaluate the mechanisms responsible for stress-induced growth inhibition under the mild/moderate soil drying that crop plants are typically exposed to.

Indexed as

DroughtsArabidopsisBrassicaceaeGene Expression Regulation, PlantMultivariate AnalysisOxidation-ReductionPlant ProteinsPlant StomataPlant ProteinsBioactive cytokininsDrought resilienceMetabolite profilesRedox stateRewateringStomatal conductanceUnsupervised multivariate analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.