Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683969›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2020

Delayed Treatment (≥5 Days) by Flow Diversion of Ruptured Blister-Like Cerebral Aneurysms : Case Series of 8 Consecutive Patients.

Romain Capocci, Eimad Shotar, Federico Di Maria, Claudia Rolla-Bigliani, Amira Al Raaisi, Arthur André, Jugurtha Mahtout, Anne-Laure Boch, Vincent Degos, Nader Sourour and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Romain CapocciDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Eimad ShotarDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Federico Di MariaDepartment of Neuroradiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Claudia Rolla-BiglianiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Amira Al RaaisiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Arthur AndréSorbonne University. Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Jugurtha MahtoutDepartment of Neuro-Intensive Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Anne-Laure BochDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Vincent DegosSorbonne University. Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Nader SourourDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Frédéric ClarençonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France. frederic.clarencon@aphp.fr.
Sorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Foch · FRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRuptured blister-like aneurysms (BLAs) are challenging lesions to treat, without any consensus on their management. Few studies have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of flow diverter stents (FDS) for this indication, with promising results. The goal was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a delayed (≥5 days) flow diversion strategy for the treatment of ruptured intracranial BLAs. MATERIAL AND

methodsA monocentric retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of intracranial aneurysms was performed. Eight consecutive patients with 9 ruptured intracranial BLAs from November 2010 to June 2018 were included in the study. The BLA treatment with FDS was delayed from the rupture (minimum rupture to treatment delay = 5 days, mean = 16.9 ± 9.2 days). Procedure-related complications were systematically recorded. Rebleeding occurrences were systematically assessed. Long-term clinical and angiographic follow-ups were recorded.

resultsNo procedure-related death was recorded. Neither early nor late rebleeding was observed and one (12.5%) major procedure-related complication occurred (ischemic stroke). Most of the patients (5/8; 62.5%) had an mRS <2 at discharge. The immediate periprocedural control angiogram showed a complete exclusion of the aneurysm in one patient (12.5%) but at follow-up (mean delay = 19.8 months) all patients had a complete aneurysm occlusion. All patients had a long-term mRS <2.

conclusionThis case series suggests that a delayed treatment (≥5 days after the hemorrhagic event) of ruptured BLAs with FDS is feasible, and may be safe and effective in terms of rebleeding prevention and long-term angiographic outcome.

Indexed as

StentsAdultAgedAneurysm, RupturedEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeAntiplatelet therapyBlister-like aneurysmCerebral aneurysmDissectionFlow diverter stent

Identifiers

PMID30683969
OpenAlexW2914882232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.