Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683957›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Spatial and feature-based attention to expressive faces.

Kestutis Kveraga, David De Vito, Cody Cushing, Hee Yeon Im, Daniel N Albohn, Reginald B Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Modelling decision-making biases.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kestutis KveragaAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. kestas@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-0985
David De VitoDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Cody CushingDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hee Yeon ImAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Daniel N AlbohnDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Reginald B AdamsDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Funding

Neurodynamics of Compound Threat Cue PerceptionR01MH101194 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KVERAGA, KESTUTIS · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
National Institute of Mental Health (US) R01MH101194NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial emotion is an important cue for deciding whether an individual is potentially helpful or harmful. However, facial expressions are inherently ambiguous and observers typically employ other cues to categorize emotion expressed on the face, such as race, sex, and context. Here, we explored the effect of increasing or reducing different types of uncertainty associated with a facial expression that is to be categorized. On each trial, observers responded according to the emotion and location of a peripherally presented face stimulus and were provided with either: (1) no information about the upcoming face; (2) its location; (3) its expressed emotion; or (4) both its location and emotion. While cueing emotion or location resulted in faster response times than cueing unpredictive information, cueing face emotion alone resulted in faster responses than cueing face location alone. Moreover, cueing both stimulus location and emotion resulted in a superadditive reduction of response times compared with cueing location or emotion alone, suggesting that feature-based attention to emotion and spatially selective attention interact to facilitate perception of face stimuli. While categorization of facial expressions was significantly affected by stable identity cues (sex and race) in the face, we found that these interactions were eliminated when uncertainty about facial expression, but not spatial uncertainty about stimulus location, was reduced by predictive cueing. This demonstrates that feature-based attention to facial expression greatly attenuates the need to rely on stable identity cues to interpret facial emotion.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultAttentionEmotionsFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMaleSpace PerceptionYoung AdultAngerFacial identityHappinessThreat perception

Identifiers

PMID30683957
PMCPMC7491605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.