Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683942›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2019

Differential involvement of dopamine receptor subtypes in the acquisition of Pavlovian sign-tracking and goal-tracking responses.

Stephanie Roughley, Simon Killcross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie RoughleySchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. stephanie.kelly@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3840-453X
Simon KillcrossSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePrevious work has identified that different forms of Pavlovian conditioned approach, sign-tracking and goal-tracking, are governed by distinct neurochemical mechanisms when compared in animals predisposed to learning one form vs. the other.

objectivesThe present study aimed to investigate whether these are also neurochemically distinct processes in a population of animals capable of developing either response when this is manipulated via the use of distinct conditioned stimuli (CS).

methodsRats were trained on one of two Pavlovian conditioning procedures in which the CS was either a lever, which elicits sign-tracking, or an auditory click, which elicits goal-tracking. The differential involvement of dopamine D1- and D2-receptors (D1R; D2R) in the acquisition of approach types was investigated via systemic administration of antagonists selective to one or both receptor subtypes during Pavlovian training.

resultsResults indicate that dopaminergic signalling is important for the acquisition of both sign-tracking and goal-tracking responses. However, whilst development of sign-tracking to a lever depends on activity at both D1R and D2R, development of goal-tracking in response to a click was shown to depend only on activity at D1R.

conclusionsWe suggest that the importance of D1R activity in both sign- and goal-tracking acquisition reflects a general role in learning Pavlovian associations, which aligns with data implicating dopamine in prediction error processes. In contrast, the selective involvement of D2R activity in sign-tracking acquisition may reflect its importance in motivational processes such as incentive salience attribution.

Indexed as

GoalsAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalDopamineDopamine AntagonistsMaleMotivationRatsRats, WistarReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2DopamineDopamine AntagonistsReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2D1D2DopamineIncentive salienceLearningPavlovian conditioningSign-tracking

Identifiers

PMID30683942
PMCPMC6602989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.