ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2019
A validated PROM in genetic counselling: the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incorporating patient perspectives in the development of a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening: a sequential systematic review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Pooled it
- A preliminary adaptation and validation of the genetic counseling outcome scale (GCOS-24) for use in Greece.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Exploring the potential usefulness of the GCOS-16 for expanded applications.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural validation of the genetic counseling outcome scale in Korea.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and preliminary validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for genetic counseling outcomes in Sweden.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counseling.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Using Rasch measurement theory to explore the fitness for purpose of the genetic counseling outcome scale: a tale of two scales.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Ethical principles, challenges and opportunities when conducting genetic counselling for schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Rapid Implementation of Telegenetic Counseling in the COVID-19 and Swedish Healthcare Context: A Feasibility Study.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient empowerment has been identified as a key outcome goal in genetic counselling, and a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) has been developed to measure empowerment in genetic services: the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS). Here we validate the GCOS for a large and diverse Dutch study sample of 2194 patients referred to two clinical genetic centres for counselling about a wide range of conditions (heart disease, neurological disorders, cancer, congenital syndromes, intellectual disability and prenatal pathology). Our results suggest that the GCOS consists of a hierarchical 6-factor structure, with a main scale for empowerment and six subscales: uncertainty about heredity, hope, negative emotions, knowledge about the condition, knowledge about genetic services and uncertainty about the treatment. Six of the original 24 GCOS items were removed due to low factor loadings and small inter-item correlations. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the main scale and most subscales were satisfactory. Convergent validity was confirmed by moderate positive and moderate/strong negative associations between the GCOS main scale and other validated outcome measures. Responsiveness was comparable to that of other validated outcome measures. We saw significant improvement in the GCOS main scale and all the subscales after the first genetic counselling session. This study contributes to the international validation process of the GCOS, with the ultimate goal of using this instrument as a PROM, with empowerment as an outcome measure, to evaluate and improve the quality of genetic counselling in various clinical genetics settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.