Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683923›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2019

Comparison of methods for multivariate gene-based association tests for complex diseases using common variants.

Jaeyoon Chung, Gyungah R Jun, Josée Dupuis, Lindsay A Farrer

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Modulatory Neurotransmitter Genotypes Shape Dynamic Functional Connectome Reconfigurations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetic Epidemiology of Complex Phenotypes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaeyoon ChungBioinformatics Graduate Program, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6431-9454
Gyungah R JunDepartment of Medicine (Biomedical Genetics), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Josée DupuisDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lindsay A FarrerBioinformatics Graduate Program, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. farrer@bu.edu.
Boston University · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Genetics ConsortiumU01AG032984 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHELLENBERG, GERARD DAVID · 2009 to 2024
$60.4M
Neuropathology CoreP30AG013846 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KOWALL, NEIL W. · 1996 to 2020
$29.1M
Alzheimer Disease Genetic Architecture in African AmericansR01AG048927 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Lindsay A. Farrer · 2015 to 2026
$8.4M
Genomic and Biological Studies of APOE ε2 in Alzheimer DiseaseRF1AG057519 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI FARRER, LINDSAY A., JUN, GYUNGAH · 2017 to 2017
$2.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013846NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048927NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG057519NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex diseases are usually associated with multiple correlated phenotypes, and the analysis of composite scores or disease status may not fully capture the complexity (or multidimensionality). Joint analysis of multiple disease-related phenotypes in genetic tests could potentially increase power to detect association of a disease with common SNPs (or genes). Gene-based tests are designed to identify genes containing multiple risk variants that individually are weakly associated with a univariate trait. We combined three multivariate association tests (O'Brien method, TATES, and MultiPhen) with two gene-based association tests (GATES and VEGAS) and compared performance (type I error and power) of six multivariate gene-based methods using simulated data. Data (n = 2000) for genetic sequence and correlated phenotypes were simulated by varying causal variant proportions and phenotype correlations for various scenarios. These simulations showed that two multivariate association tests (TATES and MultiPhen, but not O'Brien) paired with VEGAS have inflated type I error in all scenarios, while the three multivariate association tests paired with GATES have correct type I error. MultiPhen paired with GATES has higher power than competing methods if the correlations among phenotypes are low (r < 0.57). We applied these gene-based association methods to a GWAS dataset from the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium containing three neuropathological traits related to Alzheimer disease (neuritic plaque, neurofibrillary tangles, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy) measured in 3500 autopsied brains. Gene-level significant evidence (P < 2.7 × 10

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAlzheimer DiseaseComputer SimulationDiseaseHumansMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30683923
PMCPMC6461986
OpenAlexW2913765035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.