Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683753›Full record

ArticleGenome research2019

High-throughput functional analysis of lncRNA core promoters elucidates rules governing tissue specificity.

Kaia Mattioli, Pieter-Jan Volders, Chiara Gerhardinger, James C Lee, Philipp G Maass, Marta Melé, John L Rinn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026
    Review
  6. LncR12304.1-miR1507c-Horticulture research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaia MattioliDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Pieter-Jan VoldersDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Chiara GerhardingerDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
James C LeeDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Philipp G MaassDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Marta Melé *Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
John L Rinn *Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

Funding

Regulatory Roles and Dynamics of Nuclear long-noncoding RNAs in PluripotencyP01GM099117 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MEISSNER, ALEXANDER · 2011 to 2021
$21.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM099117Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105920/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription initiates at both coding and noncoding genomic elements, including mRNA and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) core promoters and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). However, each class has a different expression profile with lncRNAs and eRNAs being the most tissue specific. How these complex differences in expression profiles and tissue specificities are encoded in a single DNA sequence remains unresolved. Here, we address this question using computational approaches and massively parallel reporter assays (MPRA) surveying hundreds of promoters and enhancers. We find that both divergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters have higher capacities to drive transcription than nondivergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters, respectively. Conversely, intergenic lncRNAs (lincRNAs) and eRNAs have lower capacities to drive transcription and are more tissue specific than divergent genes. This higher tissue specificity is strongly associated with having less complex transcription factor (TF) motif profiles at the core promoter. We experimentally validated these findings by testing both engineered single-nucleotide deletions and human single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MPRA. In both cases, we observe that single nucleotides associated with many motifs are important drivers of promoter activity. Thus, we suggest that high TF motif density serves as a robust mechanism to increase promoter activity at the expense of tissue specificity. Moreover, we find that 22% of common SNPs in core promoter regions have significant regulatory effects. Collectively, our findings show that high TF motif density provides redundancy and increases promoter activity at the expense of tissue specificity, suggesting that specificity of expression may be regulated by simplicity of motif usage.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticGenome, HumanHumansOrgan SpecificityPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID30683753
PMCPMC6396428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.