Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683748›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2019

Changes in the Active, Dead, and Dormant Microbial Community Structure across a Pleistocene Permafrost Chronosequence.

Alexander Burkert, Thomas A Douglas, Mark P Waldrop, Rachel Mackelprang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microbial life in slow and stopped lanes.Trends in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander BurkertDepartment of Biology, California State University, Northridge, California, USA.
Thomas A DouglasU.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Fort Wainwright, Alaska, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1314-1905
Mark P WaldropGeology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Rachel MackelprangDepartment of Biology, California State University, Northridge, California, USA rachel.mackelprang@csun.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7213-7415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Permafrost hosts a community of microorganisms that survive and reproduce for millennia despite extreme environmental conditions, such as water stress, subzero temperatures, high salinity, and low nutrient availability. Many studies focused on permafrost microbial community composition use DNA-based methods, such as metagenomics and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. However, these methods do not distinguish among active, dead, and dormant cells. This is of particular concern in ancient permafrost, where constant subzero temperatures preserve DNA from dead organisms and dormancy may be a common survival strategy. To circumvent this, we applied (i) LIVE/DEAD differential staining coupled with microscopy, (ii) endospore enrichment, and (iii) selective depletion of DNA from dead cells to permafrost microbial communities across a Pleistocene permafrost chronosequence (19,000, 27,000, and 33,000 years old). Cell counts and analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicons from live, dead, and dormant cells revealed how communities differ between these pools, how they are influenced by soil physicochemical properties, and whether they change over geologic time. We found evidence that cells capable of forming endospores are not necessarily dormant and that members of the class

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyActinobacteriaAlaskaBacillaceaeCarbonClostridiaceaeDNA, BacterialEcologyFreezingMetagenomicsMicrobiotaPermafrostPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSpores, BacterialCarbonDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil16S rRNAmicrobial ecologypermafrost

Identifiers

PMID30683748
PMCPMC6585489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.