Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683703›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2019

Differences in Self-Recognition between Secreted Antibody and Membrane-Bound B Cell Antigen Receptor.

Joseena Iype, Moumita Datta, Ahmad Khadour, Rudolf Übelhart, Antonella Nicolò, Tim Rollenske, Marcus Dühren-von Minden, Hedda Wardemann, Palash C Maity, Hassan Jumaa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. IGLV3-21HemaSphere · 2026
    Article
  2. The Immunopathogenesis of uveitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseena IypeInstitute of Immunology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; and.
Moumita DattaInstitute of Immunology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; and.
Ahmad KhadourInstitute of Immunology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; and.ORCID 0000-0002-9508-9823
Rudolf ÜbelhartInstitute of Immunology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; and.
Antonella NicolòInstitute of Immunology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; and.ORCID 0000-0003-3105-7571
Tim RollenskeDivision of B Cell Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcus Dühren-von MindenInstitute of Immunology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; and.
Hedda WardemannDivision of B Cell Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3921-5933
Palash C MaityInstitute of Immunology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; and.ORCID 0000-0003-3295-5859
Hassan JumaaInstitute of Immunology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; and hassan.jumaa@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3383-141X
Universität Ulm · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The random gene segment rearrangement during B cell development ensures Ab repertoire diversity. Because this process might generate autoreactive specificities, it has been proposed that stringent selection mechanisms prevent the development of autoreactive B cells. However, conventional assays to identify autoreactive B cells usually employ in vitro-generated Abs, which differ from membrane-bound BCRs. In this study, we used a cell-based assay to investigate the autoreactivity of membrane-bound BCRs derived from different B cell developmental stages of human peripheral blood. Contrasted to soluble Ab counterparts, only a few of the tested BCRs were autoreactive, although the cell-based assay sensitively detects feeble Ag recognition of a germline-reverted murine BCR that was selected after OVA immunization of mice, whereas conventional assays failed to do so. Together, these data suggest that proper identification of autoreactive B cells requires the membrane-bound BCR, as the soluble Ab may largely differ from its BCR counterpart in Ag binding.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneCells, CulturedFemaleImmunoglobulin MMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutReceptors, Antigen, B-CellImmunoglobulin MReceptors, Antigen, B-Cell

Identifiers

PMID30683703
PMCPMC6379807
OpenAlexW2914560368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.