Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683606›Full record

Observational studyJournal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation2019

Quantifying the Time Used for Renal Dietitian's Responsibilities: A Pilot Study.

Rosa K Hand, Jeffrey M Albert, Ashwini R Sehgal

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Changes in US Dialysis Dietitian Responsibilities and Patient Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa K HandDepartment of Nutrition and PhD Program Clinical Translational Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: rosa.hand@case.edu.
Jeffrey M AlbertDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ashwini R SehgalCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Case Western Reserve University · USMetroHealth Medical Center · US

Funding

Using Lay Health Advisors to Help African American Patients Address the Social Context of HypertensionU54MD002265 · NIMHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SEHGAL, ASHWINI · 2017 to 2021
$7.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD002265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to quantify how dialysis dietitians spend their time and whether the activities that were most frequent varied based on the ratio of patient to full-time equivalent (FTE) dietitian.

methodsThis study is a cross-sectional, observational, time-and-motion study carried out using the Work Activity Measurement by Activity Timing software/method for time recording. This study was carried out in 14 dialysis centers in and around Cleveland, Ohio. Fourteen registered dietitian nutritionists participated in this study. The mean time/experience of these nutritionists in dietetics was 26.6 ± 8.5 years. Percent of time in direct care (e.g., patient interaction) versus indirect care (e.g., documentation and plans of care, professional communication) versus other responsibilities (e.g., administrative work, education of self or others).

resultsThe mean number of tasks recorded per 3-hour observation session was 38.3 ± 14.0, including 18.5 ± 7.7 indirect care tasks, 7.7 ± 6.2 direct care tasks, and 9.7 ± 5.4 other tasks. The mean number of unique patients seen per observation session was 6.9 ± 5.4; the mean direct care time per patient encounter was 6.95 ± 4.05 minutes. Indirect care took the highest proportion of observed time, 56.0 ± 22.2%, followed by direct care, 24.9 ± 18.8%. Increasing the ratio of patient to FTE had a moderate negative correlation with the percent of time spent in direct patient care (r = -0.35, P = .21), but there was no relationship between the ratio of patient to FTE and direct care time per patient (r = 0.02, P = .94).

conclusionAbout 25% of dietitians' time was available for direct patient care. This is much less than that reported in previous studies and may not be sufficient to improve the nutritional status. Limitations of our study include a small sample size from a single region. Further work is needed to understand the balance of responsibilities among renal dietitians and their impact on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsRenal DialysisTime ManagementAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNutritionistsOhioPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime and Motion StudiesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID30683606
PMCPMC6646108
OpenAlexW2914296372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.