Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683140›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Why patients decline participation in an intervention to reduce re-hospitalization through patient activation: whom are we missing?

Maria Flink, Carina Brandberg, Mirjam Ekstedt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02823795 (The Supporting Patient Activation in Transition to Home), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02823795 nacompletednot on this map

The Supporting Patient Activation in Transition to Home (sPATH) Intervention - a Study Protocol of Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2016 to 2018Enrolled118ConditionsMedication Adherence, Self-care, Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsMotivational Interviewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria FlinkDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0536-0024
Carina BrandbergDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mirjam EkstedtDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. mirjam.ekstedt@lnu.se.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SELinnaeus University · SE

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2015-00412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite worldwide interest in reducing re-hospitalization, there is limited knowledge regarding characteristics of patients who chose to decline participation in such efforts and why. The aim is to explore reasons to decline participation in an intervention using motivational interviewing to reduce re-hospitalization through patient activation for persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure.

methodsThis study uses data from 385 patients who were asked about participating in a randomized controlled trial; of these, 232 declined participation. Data on age, gender, and diagnosis were collected for those who agreed to participate and those who declined. Reasons to decline participation were collected for those who were asked to participate but refused. The stated reasons to decline were analyzed using content analysis, and the categories identified were used for the statistical analysis.

resultsThe main reasons for declining participation were having sufficient support (17.5%), no need for support (16%), being too ill (14.6%), and lack of time for illness-related activities (14.2%). A statistically significant negative association between age and willingness to participate was found (odds ratio = - 0.03, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.99).

conclusionsThose who agreed to participate were younger than non-participants, and non-participants either lacked time for illness-related activities or did not have the energy needed to become involved in the intervention.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02823795 . Registered on 1 July 2016.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingPatient ReadmissionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCOPDHeart failurePatient activation interventionRandomized controlled trialRe-hospitalizationSelf-care

Identifiers

PMID30683140
PMCPMC6347805
OpenAlexW2938357524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.