Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683122›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2019

Correlation of regional deposition dosage for inhaled nanoparticles in human and rat olfactory.

Lin Tian, Yidan Shang, Rui Chen, Ru Bai, Chunying Chen, Kiao Inthavong, Jiyuan Tu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04018963 (Numerical Simulation Analysis of Nasal Physiology After Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery.), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04018963 unknown statusnot on this map

Numerical Simulation Analysis of Nasal Physiology After Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery.

TypeobservationalSponsorZhebao WuRan2019 to 2021Enrolled100ConditionsPituitary Tumor, Endoscopic Surgery, Quality of Life, Function of NoseArmsSingle nostril approach endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery, Bilateral nostril approach endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. [Effect of nasal swell body on nasal airflow and Artemisia pollen deposition].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The health effects of ultrafine particles.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lin TianSchool of Engineering - Mechanical and Automotive, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Yidan ShangSchool of Engineering - Mechanical and Automotive, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Rui ChenCAS Key Lab for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety & CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ambient Particles Health Effects and Prevention Techniques, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing, China.
Ru BaiCAS Key Lab for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety & CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ambient Particles Health Effects and Prevention Techniques, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing, China.
Chunying ChenCAS Key Lab for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety & CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ambient Particles Health Effects and Prevention Techniques, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing, China. chenchy@nanoctr.cn.
Kiao InthavongSchool of Engineering - Mechanical and Automotive, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Jiyuan TuSchool of Engineering - Mechanical and Automotive, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia. jiyuan.tu@rmit.edu.au.
National Center for Nanoscience and Technology · CNRMIT University · AUTsinghua University · CN

Funding

Australian Research Council DE180101138Australian Research Council DP160101953CAS Key Research Program for Frontier Sciences QYZDJ-SSW-SLH022China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists 11425520Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2016YFA0201600National Natural Science Foundation of China 11621505National Natural Science Foundation of China 21477029National Natural Science Foundation of China 91543206National Natural Science Foundation of China 91643102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNose-to-brain transport of airborne ultrafine particles (UFPs) via the olfactory pathway has been verified as a possible route for particle translocation into the brain. The exact relationship between increased airborne toxicant exposure and neurological deterioration in the human central nervous system, is still unclear. However, the nasal olfactory is undoubtedly a critical junction where the time course and toxicant dose dependency might be inferred.

methodComputational fluid-particle dynamics modeling of inhaled nanoparticles (1 to 100 nm) under low to moderate breathing conditions (5 to 14 L/min - human; and 0.14 to 0.40 L/min - rat) were performed in physiologically realistic human and rat nasal airways. The simulation emphasized olfactory deposition, and variations in airflow and particle flux caused by the inter-species airway geometry differences. Empirical equations were developed to predict regional deposition rates of inhaled nanoparticles on human and rat olfactory mucosa in sedentary breathing. Considering, breathing and geometric differences, quantified correlations between human and the rat olfactory deposition dose against a variety of metrics were proposed.

resultsRegional deposition of nanoparticles in human and the rat olfactory was extremely low, with the highest deposition (< 3.5 and 8.1%) occurring for high diffusivity particles of 1.5 nm and 5 nm, respectively. Due to significant filtering of extremely small particles (< 2 nm) by abrupt sharp turns at front of the rat nose, only small fractions of the inhaled nanoparticles (in this range) reached rat olfactory than that in human (1.25 to 45%); however, for larger sizes (> 3 nm), significantly higher percentage of the inhaled nanoparticles reached rat nasal olfactory than that in human (2 to 32 folds). Taking into account the physical and geometric features between human and rat, the total deposition rate (#/min) and deposition rate per unit surface area (#/min/mm

conclusionRegional deposition dose of inhaled nanoparticles in a human and rat olfactory region was governed by particle size and the breathing rate. Interspecies correlation was determined by combining the effect of deposition dosage, physical\geometric features, and genetic differences. Developed empirical equations provided a tool to quantify inhaled nanoparticle dose in human and rat nasal olfactory regions, which lay the ground work for comprehensive interspecies correlation between the two species. Furthermore, this study contributes to the fields in toxicology, i.e., neurotoxicity evaluation and risk assessment of UFPs, in long-term and low-dose inhalation exposure scenarios.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsComputational BiologyDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansInhalation ExposureNanoparticlesOlfactory BulbOlfactory MucosaParticle SizeRatsSpecies SpecificityTissue DistributionHuman and rat interspecies extrapolationInhalation toxicityNanoparticlesNasal olfactoryNeurotoxicityOlfactory depositionOlfactory pathway

Identifiers

PMID30683122
PMCPMC6346518
OpenAlexW2926751796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.