Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683092›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2019

Pace and determinants of implementation of the self-management of well-being group intervention: a multilevel observational study.

Daphne Kuiper, Nardi Steverink, Roy E Stewart, Sijmen A Reijneveld, Robbert Sanderman, Martine M Goedendorp

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daphne KuiperService Desk Clinical Research Office, UMC staff, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, AB41, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nardi SteverinkDepartment of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Roy E StewartDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA10, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sijmen A ReijneveldDepartment of Health Sciences, (Community & Occupational Medicine) University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA10, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robbert SandermanDepartment of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Martine M GoedendorpDepartment of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.m.goedendorp@vu.nl.

Funding

Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development 313010401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen implementing an empirically supported intervention (ESI) arrays of influencing factors operate on the professional and organizational level, but so far dependency between these levels has often been ignored. The aim of this study is to describe the pace and identify determinants of implementation of the Self-Management of Well-being (SMW) group intervention while taking the dependency between professionals and organizations into account.

methodsPace of implementation was measured as the time between training of professionals and first use of the SMW intervention in months. Determinants of first use were derived from the Fleuren framework and assessed using web-based questionnaires and telephone interviews. First, univariate analyses, Fisher's exact tests and t-tests, were performed to identify determinants of first use of the SMW intervention on the individual professional and the organizational level independently. Second, multilevel analyses were performed to correct for the dependency between professionals and organizations. Simple multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed with determinants found significant in the univariate analyses as independent variables, first use as dependent variable, professionals entered in the first level, and organizations in the second level.

resultsForty-eight professionals from 18 organizations were trained to execute the SMW intervention. Thirty-two professionals achieved first use, at a mean pace of 7.5 months ± 4.2. Determinants on the professional level were 'ownership', 'relative advantage', 'support from colleagues' and 'compatibility'. Determinants on the organizational level were 'organizational size' and 'innovation-task orientation fit'. Multilevel analysis showed that 'compatibility', a factor on the professional level, was the only significant determinant contributing to first use in the multilevel model.

conclusionsThis implementation study revealed a strong dependency between professionals and organizations. Results showed that a majority of professionals used the SMW intervention in about 8 months. When the dependency between professionals and organization was taken into account, the professionals' perception of compatibility was the only remaining determinant of implementation on the professional level. Organizational size and managers' perception of 'innovation-task orientation fit' were determinants of implementation on the organizational level. It is advisable to discuss the compatibility between new and current tasks among managers and professionals before adopting a new intervention.

Indexed as

Organizational InnovationAdultFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPerceptionProcedures and Techniques UtilizationSelf-ManagementSocial WelfareSurveys and QuestionnairesDeterminantsHealth careImplementationMultilevel-analysisOlder adultsPaceSelf-managementSocial careWell-being

Identifiers

PMID30683092
PMCPMC6346574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.