ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2019
Whole chloroplast genome and gene locus phylogenies reveal the taxonomic placement and relationship of Tripidium (Panicoideae: Andropogoneae) to sugarcane.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- A global phylogenetic framework for Diospyros L. (Ebenaceae, Ericales): enhanced taxon and sample coverage through NGS, Sanger sequencing and herbariomics.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Haplotype-resolved genome assembly sheds light on the evolutionary history of autohexaploid Tripidium arundinaceum.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cytotype classification and genetic diversity of Platostoma palustre revealed by rDNA localization and chloroplast genome.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Near-complete genome assembly of allotetraploid Erianthus rockii reveals unique chromosome evolution and lineage-divergence trajectories in the Saccharum complex.Plant communications · 2025Article
- Unraveling Phylogenetic Relationships Among SixGenes · 2025Article
- Divergent landscapes and evolutionary trajectories of 5S rDNA and Cassandra retroelement in Saccharinae.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Research Progress on 35S rDNA and 5S rDNA in Sugarcane: Challenges and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Reassessing the phylogenetic relationships ofPlant diversity · 2025Article
- Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome and development of molecular markers of Salix.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Molecular Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of Centipedegrass [Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- A complete gap-free diploid genome in Saccharum complex and the genomic footprints of evolution in the highly polyploid Saccharum genus.Nature plants · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial genome sequencing and analysis of the invasivebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Revisiting chloroplast genomic landscape and annotation towards comparative chloroplast genomes of Rhamnaceae.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Transcriptome-based variations effectively untangling the intraspecific relationships and selection signals in Xinyang Maojian tea population.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Comparative Analysis and Development of Molecular Markers forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genome inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Comparative analysis of Thalassionema chloroplast genomes revealed hidden biodiversity.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Field evaluation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Chromosomal Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor over 50 years, attempts have been made to introgress agronomically useful traits from Erianthus sect. Ripidium (Tripidium) species into sugarcane based on both genera being part of the 'Saccharum Complex', an interbreeding group of species believed to be involved in the origins of sugarcane. However, recent low copy number gene studies indicate that Tripidium and Saccharum are more divergent than previously thought. The extent of genus Tripidium has not been fully explored and many species that should be included in Tripidium are still classified as Saccharum. Moreover, Tripidium is currently defined as incertae sedis within the Andropogoneae, though it has been suggested that members of this genus are related to the Germainiinae.
resultsEight newly-sequenced chloroplasts from potential Tripidium species were combined in a phylogenetic study with 46 members of the Panicoideae, including seven Saccharum accessions, two Miscanthidium and three Miscanthus species. A robust chloroplast phylogeny was generated and comparison with a gene locus phylogeny clearly places a monophyletic Tripidium clade outside the bounds of the Saccharinae. A key to the currently identified Tripidium species is presented.
conclusionFor the first time, we have undertaken a large-scale whole plastid study of eight newly assembled Tripidium accessions and a gene locus study of five Tripidium accessions. Our findings show that Tripidium and Saccharum are 8 million years divergent, last sharing a common ancestor 12 million years ago. We demonstrate that four species should be removed from Saccharum/Erianthus and included in genus Tripidium. In a genome context, we show that Tripidium evolved from a common ancestor with and extended Germainiinae clade formed from Germainia, Eriochrysis, Apocopis, Pogonatherum and Imperata. We re-define the 'Saccharum complex' to a group of genera that can interbreed in the wild and extend the Saccharinae to include Sarga along with Sorghastrum, Microstegium vimineum and Polytrias (but excluding Sorghum). Monophyly of genus Tripidium is confirmed and the genus is expanded to include Tripidium arundinaceum, Tripidium procerum, Tripidium kanashiroi and Tripidium rufipilum. As a consequence, these species are excluded from genus Saccharum. Moreover, we demonstrate that genus Tripidium is distinct from the Germainiinae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.