Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30683051›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

Communication, continuity and coordination of care are the most important patients' values for family medicine in a fee-for-services health system.

Marie Droz, Nicolas Senn, Christine Cohidon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Task Shifting, eHealth and Shared Decision-Making-Preference Heterogeneity in the Adult Population for Developments in Outpatient Primary Healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie DrozDepartment of ambulatory care and community medicine, Institute of Family Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas SennDepartment of ambulatory care and community medicine, Institute of Family Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christine CohidonDepartment of ambulatory care and community medicine, Institute of Family Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. christine.cohidon@hospvd.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-2343-500X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepresenting 60% of medical consultations in Switzerland, primary care holds an important place in our medical system. Patients' values in family medicine (FM) are nowadays recognized as important factors to take into account in order to provide good quality of care. The aim of this study is to describe patients' most important values regarding FM and to assess their associations with socio-demographics factors in a fee-for-services health system.

methodsWe analyzed the Swiss 2012 study on Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICOPC). Two-hundred patients, randomly drawn, answered a questionnaire about their values regarding FM just after their consultation. Explored values were related to communication and patient-centeredness care, continuity and coordination, care access, and patients' activation. We described values reaching more than 50% of "very important". Then, multivariate analyses were performed for the most important value of each dimension.

resultsItems related to "communication and patient-centeredness care" and "coordination and continuity of care" are the most recurrently mentioned as "very important". Items related to access and patients' activation are generally declared as "very important" by less than 50% of patients. Whatever the domain and the item, women systematically grant items more often as "very important" than men. Variations are observed according to the age, and the presence or not of a chronic disease.

conclusionSuch dimensions should be subject to a special attention by general practitioners and public health authorities as it might enhance the quality of care and the patients' satisfaction.

Indexed as

CommunicationContinuity of Patient CareFamily PracticePatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient RelationsFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandCommunicationContinuityCoordinationFamily medicineValues

Identifiers

PMID30683051
PMCPMC6346577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.