Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30682902›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of audiology2019

Auditory event-related potentials and function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in children with auditory processing disorders.

Thierry Morlet, Kyoko Nagao, L Ashleigh Greenwood, R Matthew Cardinale, Rebecca G Gaffney, Tammy Riegner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of audiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Auditory Processing Disorder Targets Phonetics, Not Phonology.Proceedings of the ... Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston University Conference on Language Development · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thierry Morleta Auditory Physiology and Psychoacoustics Research Laboratory , Center for Pediatric Auditory Speech and Sciences, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , DE , USA.
Kyoko Nagaoa Auditory Physiology and Psychoacoustics Research Laboratory , Center for Pediatric Auditory Speech and Sciences, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , DE , USA.
L Ashleigh Greenwooda Auditory Physiology and Psychoacoustics Research Laboratory , Center for Pediatric Auditory Speech and Sciences, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , DE , USA.
R Matthew Cardinalea Auditory Physiology and Psychoacoustics Research Laboratory , Center for Pediatric Auditory Speech and Sciences, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , DE , USA.
Rebecca G Gaffneya Auditory Physiology and Psychoacoustics Research Laboratory , Center for Pediatric Auditory Speech and Sciences, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , DE , USA.
Tammy Riegnere Department of Audiology , Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , DE , USA.

Funding

Center for Pediatric ResearchP20GM103464 · NIGMS · NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, DELAWARE · PI SHAFFER, THOMAS H · 2012 to 2014
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objectives were to investigate the function of central auditory pathways and of the medial efferent olivocochlear system (MOCS).

designEvent-related potentials (ERP) were recorded following the delivery of the stimulus /da/ in quiet and in ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural noise conditions and correlated to the results of the auditory processing disorders (APD) diagnostic test battery. MOCS function was investigated by adding ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural noise to transient evoked otoacoustic emission recordings. Auditory brainstem responses and pure tone audiogram were also evaluated. STUDY SAMPLE: Nineteen children (7 to 12 years old) with APD were compared with 24 age-matched controls.

resultsOtoacoustic emissions and ABR characteristics did not differ between groups, whereas ERP latencies were significantly longer and of higher amplitudes in APD children than in controls, in both quiet and noise conditions. The MOCS suppression was higher in APD children.

conclusionsFindings indicate that children with APD present with neural deficiencies in both challenging and nonchallenging environments with an increase in the timing of several central auditory processes correlated to their behavioural performances. Meanwhile, their modulation of the auditory periphery under noisy conditions differs from control children with higher suppression.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, AuditorySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAuditory Perceptual DisordersChildCochleaEfferent PathwaysEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHumansMaleNoiseOlivary NucleusOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousPerceptual MaskingSpeech Reception Threshold TestAuditory processing disorderevent-related potentialsolivocochlear efferent systemspeech in noise

Identifiers

PMID30682902
PMCPMC6430672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.