Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30682717›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2019

The unexpected habitat in sewer pipes for the propagation of microbial communities and their imprint on urban waters.

Sandra L McLellan, Adélaïde Roguet

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Culture, qPCR, and genome-based surveillance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of anFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Scientific novelty beyond the experiment.Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra L McLellanSchool of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53204, USA. Electronic address: mclellan@uwm.edu.
Adélaïde RoguetSchool of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53204, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

Microbial Community Profiles Identify New Indicators of Waterborne PathogensR01AI091829 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI MCLELLAN, SANDRA L. · 2011 to 2019
$3.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI091829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern urban sewer pipe infrastructure is a unique niche where microbes can thrive. Arcobacter, Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, and Trichococcus are among the organisms that dominate the microbial community of sewage influent, but are not major members of human fecal microbiome, drinking water, or groundwater. Pipe resident communities in untreated sewage are distinct from sewer biofilm communities. Because of their high biomass, these organisms likely have a role in biotransformation of waste during conveyance and could represent an important inoculum for treatment plants. Studies demonstrate stormwater systems act as direct conduits for sewage to surface waters, releasing organisms propagated in sewer pipes. Frequent occurrence of these pipe residents, in particular Arcobacter, demonstrates the extent that urban infrastructure impacts rivers, lakes, and urban coasts worldwide.

Indexed as

EcosystemMicrobiotaFecesGroundwaterHumansSewageWater MicrobiologySewage

Identifiers

PMID30682717
PMCPMC7018504
OpenAlexW2911412012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.