Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30682701›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2019

Measuring cognitive outcomes in mindfulness-based intervention research: a reflection on confounding factors and methodological limitations.

David R Vago, Resh S Gupta, Sara W Lazar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03571386 (Mechanisms of Mindfulness-Based Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03571386 completednot on this map

Mechanisms of Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs)

TypeobservationalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2022Enrolled136ConditionsDepression, Anxiety, StressArmsMindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT), Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Quantifying variability in attentional shifts during target switching.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sleep, Cognition, and Yoga.International journal of yoga
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David R VagoContemplative Neuroscience and Integrative Medicine (CNIM) Laboratory, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA. Electronic address: David.vago@vanderbilt.edu.
Resh S GuptaContemplative Neuroscience and Integrative Medicine (CNIM) Laboratory, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
Sara W LazarAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Neural and cognitive changes associated with mindfulness training in older adultsR01AG048351 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DICKERSON, BRADFORD C, LAZAR, SARA W · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
Mindfulness Influences on Self-Regulation: Mental and Physical Health ImplicationsUH2AT009145 · NCCIH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BRITTON, WILLOUGHBY, KING, JEAN A · 2015 to 2017
$2.7M
Structural, Functional, and Behavioral Effects of MeditationR01AT006344 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LAZAR, SARA W · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT006344NCCIH NIH HHS UH2 AT009145NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One potential pathway by which mindfulness-based meditation improves health outcomes is through changes in cognitive functioning. Here, we summarize and comment upon three systematic reviews conducted over the last seven years that have had the goal of identifying the impact of mindfulness on cognitive outcomes. In our analysis, we identified a number of methodological limitations and potential confounding factors that interfere with and limit our ability to interpret the results. In order to gain a granular view of the relationship between mindfulness training and cognition, we report on the following: 1) What do we know? How does mindfulness affect cognition? 2) variable criteria that define an MBI; 2) limitations of assays used to measure cognition; and 3) methodological quality of an MBI trial and reporting of findings. Finally, we offer constructive means for interpretation and recommendations for moving the field of mindfulness research forward regarding effects on cognition.

Indexed as

CognitionMeditationMindfulnessSystematic Reviews as TopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID30682701
PMCPMC6597333
OpenAlexW2908111958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.