Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30682370›Full record

ReviewCell2019

Considerations and Challenges in Studying Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Biomolecular Condensates.

Simon Alberti, Amy Gladfelter, Tanja Mittag

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,536 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,536citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,536 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. In Vitro Assay of Bacterial RNA Helicases Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1,476 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon AlbertiMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Technische Universität Dresden, Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), Biotechnology Center, 01307 Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: Simon.Alberti@tu-dresden.de.
Amy GladfelterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA. Electronic address: amyglad@unc.edu.
Tanja MittagDepartment for Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA. Electronic address: Tanja.Mittag@stjude.org.

Funding

Cytoplasmic Organization by phase transitionsR01GM081506 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GLADFELTER, AMY S · 2010 to 2023
$4.0M
The role of weak multivalent interactions and phase separation in SPOP tumor suppressor functionR01GM112846 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI MITTAG, TANJA · 2015 to 2023
$3.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081506NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence is now mounting that liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) underlies the formation of membraneless compartments in cells. This realization has motivated major efforts to delineate the function of such biomolecular condensates in normal cells and their roles in contexts ranging from development to age-related disease. There is great interest in understanding the underlying biophysical principles and the specific properties of biological condensates with the goal of bringing insights into a wide range of biological processes and systems. The explosion of physiological and pathological contexts involving LLPS requires clear standards for their study. Here, we propose guidelines for rigorous experimental characterization of LLPS processes in vitro and in cells, discuss the caveats of common experimental approaches, and point out experimental and theoretical gaps in the field.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaLiquid-Liquid ExtractionLiquid Phase Microextraction

Identifiers

PMID30682370
PMCPMC6445271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.