Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30682209›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2019

Adaptive Optics Retinal Imaging in CNGA3-Associated Achromatopsia: Retinal Characterization, Interocular Symmetry, and Intrafamilial Variability.

Michalis Georgiou, Katie M Litts, Angelos Kalitzeos, Christopher S Langlo, Thomas Kane, Navjit Singh, Melissa Kassilian, Nashila Hirji, Neruban Kumaran, Alfredo Dubra and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Gene Therapy for Achromatopsia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adaptive Optics Imaging of Inherited Retinal Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Foveal Cone Structure in Patients With Blue Cone Monochromacy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  18. Comparison of OCT imaging in children with foveal hypoplasia born full term versus preterm.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michalis GeorgiouUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Katie M LittsDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Angelos KalitzeosUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher S LangloDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Thomas KaneUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Navjit SinghUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Melissa KassilianUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nashila HirjiUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Neruban KumaranUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alfredo DubraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States.
Joseph CarrollDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Michel MichaelidesUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Assessing Photoreceptor Structure and Function in Normal and Diseased RetinaeR01EY017607 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Joseph Carroll · 2008 to 2026
$8.3M
Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM080202 · NIGMS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BARBIERI, JOSEPH T, SALZMAN, NITA H · 2010 to 2024
$5.7M
Platform Technologies for Microscopic Retinal Imaging: Development & TranslationU01EY025477 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$4.4M
Multimodal Imaging of Photoreceptor Structure in AchromatopsiaF32EY029148 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI LITTS, KATIE M · 2018 to 2020
$148k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY029148NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017607NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025477NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080202Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 099173/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate retinal structure in subjects with CNGA3-associated achromatopsia and evaluate disease symmetry and intrafamilial variability. Methods: Thirty-eight molecularly confirmed subjects underwent ocular examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and nonconfocal split-detection adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO). OCT scans were used for evaluating foveal hypoplasia, grading foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption, and measuring outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness. AOSLO images were used to quantify peak foveal cone density, intercell distance (ICD), and the coefficient of variation (CV) of ICD. Results: Mean (±SD) age was 25.9 (±13.1) years. Mean (± SD) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.87 (±0.14) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. Examination with OCT showed variable disruption or loss of the EZ. Seven subjects were evaluated for disease symmetry, with peak foveal cone density, ICD, CV, ONL thickness, and BCVA not differing significantly between eyes. A cross-sectional evaluation of AOSLO imaging showed a mean (±SD) peak foveal cone density of 19,844 (±13,046) cones/mm2. There was a weak negative association between age and peak foveal cone density (r = -0.397, P = 0.102), as well as between EZ grade and age (P = 0.086). Conclusions: The remnant cone mosaics were irregular and variably disrupted, with significantly lower peak foveal cone density than unaffected individuals. Variability was also seen among subjects with identical mutations. Therefore, subjects should be considered on an individual basis for stratification in clinical trials. Interocular symmetry suggests that both eyes have comparable therapeutic potential and the fellow eye can serve as a valid control. Longitudinal studies are needed, to further examine the weak negative association between age and foveal cone structure observed here.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildColor Vision DefectsCross-Sectional StudiesCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsElectroretinographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmoscopyOptics and PhotonicsPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceCNGA3 protein, humanCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation Channels

Identifiers

PMID30682209
PMCPMC6354941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.