Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30682169›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The Italian Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) study: A cross sectional survey.

Francesco Cerritelli, Patrick L S van Dun, Jorge E Esteves, Giacomo Consorti, Paola Sciomachen, Eleonora Lacorte, Nicola Vanacore, OPERA-IT Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03546114 (Does Gender Matter? Patient Preference in an Italian Osteopathic Clinical Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03546114 completednot on this map

Does Gender Matter? Patient Preference in an Italian Osteopathic Clinical Setting

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituto Superiore di Osteopatia di MilanoRan2018 to 2019Enrolled105ConditionsGender RoleArmsGender Questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco CerritelliClinical Human-based Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-9620
Patrick L S van DunBelgium National Centre, Foundation COME Collaboration, Mechelen, Belgium.
Jorge E EstevesGulf National Centre, Foundation COME Collaboration, Riyadh, KSA.
Giacomo ConsortiClinical Human-based Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3085-283X
Paola SciomachenRegistro degli Osteopati d'Italia, Milan, Italy.
Eleonora LacorteNational Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Nicola VanacoreNational Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
OPERA-IT Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of osteopathic practitioners, their professional profile and features of their clinical practice, particularly where statutory regulation does not yet exist, are still significantly underreported. The Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) project was developed as an European-based census dedicated to profiling the osteopathic profession across Europe. The present study aimed to describe the osteopathic practitioners and the profession in Italy. A voluntary, online based, closed-ended survey was distributed across Italy in the period between February and June 2017. An e-based campaign was set up to reach the Italian osteopathic professionals. Participants were asked to complete the forms by filling in the information regarding the demographics, working status and professional activities, education, consultation fees, patient complaints, treatment and management. The survey was completed by 4816 individuals. 196 people started the survey but did not finish, which corresponds to a 4% attrition rate. The majority of respondents were males (66.7%). The modal age group was 30-39 (40.0%). 73.8% of respondents had a previous academic degree, mainly in the fields of sports science (36.4%) and physiotherapy (25.3%). 25.6% declared not to have a previous academic degree. The majority of respondents declared to work alone (58.4%), while the remaining declared to work in association with other professionals. The osteopaths /citizens ratio was 8.0 osteopaths/100,000 citizens. The profile of osteopaths in Italy seems to be characterised by a self-employed young adult male working mostly as a sole practitioner, who has been trained as osteopath through a part-time curriculum and had a previous degree mostly in the fields of sports science or physiotherapy. These results provide important insights into the osteopathic profession in Italy. The varied professional educational backgrounds need to be considered with regard to the implementation of a professional licensing process and future pre-registration education in the country. The number of respondents is an estimate of the actual number of Italian osteopaths. Only the completion of the regulatory process and the creation of the mandatory official register will allow to know the number of Italy based osteopaths.

Indexed as

Manipulation, OsteopathicAdultCensusesCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInternetItalyMaleOsteopathic PhysiciansPhysical Therapy SpecialtyPrevalenceSports MedicineSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30682169
PMCPMC6347434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.