Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3068216›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry1988

Localization of cathepsin L in rat kidney revealed by immunoenzyme and immunogold techniques.

S Yokota, Y Nishimura, K Kato

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S YokotaDepartment of Anatomy, Yamanashi Medical School, Japan.
Y Nishimura
K Kato
Kyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Localization of cathepsin L in rat kidney was investigated by immunocytochemical techniques. Kidneys were fixed by perfusion and embedded in Epon or Lowicryl K4M without postosmication. For light microscopy (LM), semi-thin sections of the Epon-embedded material were stained by the immunoenzyme technique after removal of epoxy resin. For electron microscopy (EM), ultra-thin sections of Lowicryl K4M-embedded material were stained by the protein A-gold technique. By LM, reaction deposits for cathepsin L were present in the cytoplasmic granules of proximal tubule cells, but little or no reaction product was noted in distal tubule, collecting tubule, and most of urinary tubules in the medulla. By EM, heavy gold label for cathepsin L was confined exclusively to lysosomes of the proximal tubule cells, but little or no label to those of the other segments. In immunocytochemical control sections, no reaction was observed. These results indicate that a main container of cathepsin L is lysosomes of the proximal tubule and suggest that the enzyme plays a role in the degradation of endocytosed proteins.

Indexed as

EndopeptidasesAnimalsCathepsin LCathepsinsCysteine EndopeptidasesCytoplasmic GranulesImmunoenzyme TechniquesImmunohistochemistryKidneyKidney Tubules, ProximalLysosomesMicroscopy, ElectronRatsStaphylococcal Protein ACathepsin LCathepsinsCtsl protein, ratCysteine EndopeptidasesEndopeptidasesStaphylococcal Protein A

Identifiers

PMID3068216
OpenAlexW2081608018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.