ArticlePloS one2019
Spatio-temporal trends in the frequency of interspecific interactions between domestic and wild ungulates from Mediterranean Spain.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Summer Facilitation to Winter Avoidance: Seasonal Shifts in Livestock-Wild Ungulate Temporal Coexistence.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Modelling tick abundance and environmental suitability in meso-Mediterranean landscapes for the prevention of tick-borne diseases.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Temporal niche partitioning among sympatric wild and domestic ungulates between warm and cold seasons.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Host-, Environment-, or Human-Related Effects Drive Interspecies Interactions in an Animal Tuberculosis Multi-Host Community Depending on the Host and Season.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2024Article
- Low transmission risk of African swine fever virus between wild boar infected by an attenuated isolate and susceptible domestic pigs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Characterization and management of interaction risks between livestock and wild ungulates on outdoor pig farms in Spain.Porcine health management · 2022Article
- Molecular Detection of Tick-Borne Pathogens in American Bison (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Interaction Patterns between Wildlife and Cattle Reveal Opportunities for Mycobacteria Transmission in Farms from North-Eastern Atlantic Iberian Peninsula.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Long-Term Determinants of the Seroprevalence of the Hepatitis E Virus in Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Spoligotype-specific risk of finding lesions in tissues from cattle infected by Mycobacterium bovis.BMC veterinary research · 2021Article
- Long-Term Determinants of Tuberculosis in the Ungulate Host Community of Doñana National Park.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Detection of Antibodies against Mycobacterium bovis in Oral Fluid from Eurasian Wild Boar.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Dynamic Network of Interactions in the Wildlife-Livestock Interface in Mediterranean Spain: An Epidemiological Point of View.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Retrospective spatial analysis for African swine fever in endemic areas to assess interactions between susceptible host populations.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- Free-Ranging Pig and Wild Boar Interactions in an Endemic Area of African Swine Fever.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Controlling infections shared by wildlife and livestock requires the understanding and quantification of interspecific interactions between the species involved. This is particularly important in extensive multi-host systems, in which controlled domestic animals interact with uncontrolled, abundant and expanding wild species, such as wild ungulates. We have, therefore, quantified the interspecific interactions between wild boar (Sus scrofa) and free-ranging cattle in Mediterranean Spain, along with their spatio-temporal variability. GPS-GSM-collars were used to monitor 12 cows and 14 wild boar in the Doñana National Park between 2011 and 2013. Interactions were defined as encounters between cattle and wild boar within a spatio-temporal window of 52 m and 1 hour. On average, each wild boar interacted with one cow 1.5 ± (SE) 0.5 times per day, while each cow interacted with one wild boar 1.3 ± 0.4 times per day. The frequency of interaction was significantly higher during crepuscular hours owing to the overlap of both species' activity, and also during spring and autumn, probably owing to a higher individual aggregation around shared resources. Finally, the frequency of interaction was higher near the most significant shared resources (e.g. water points) but was lower in areas with dense vegetation. The results presented here show the usefulness of GPS monitoring as regards quantifying interactions and helping to clarify the process of pathogen transmission at the wildlife-livestock interface in Mediterranean Spain, along with the main spatio-temporal risk factors. In a changing scenario in which European populations of wild ungulates are increasing, more efficient measures with which to control interactions are required to meet the demands of farmers and managers. Our results, therefore, provide directional hypotheses that could be used to design disease control programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.