Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30682056›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The role of human rights in implementing socially responsible seafood.

Lydia C L Teh, Richard Caddell, Edward H Allison, Elena M Finkbeiner, John N Kittinger, Katrina Nakamura, Yoshitaka Ota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Social sustainability in seafood systems: a rapid review.Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Fish crimes in the global oceans.Science advances · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lydia C L TehThe Nippon Foundation Nereus Program, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0981-7511
Richard CaddellSchool of Law and Politics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Edward H AllisonSchool of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Elena M FinkbeinerThe Nippon Foundation Nereus Program, Vancouver, Canada.
John N KittingerConservation International, Center for Oceans, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.
Katrina NakamuraThe Sustainability Incubator, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.
Yoshitaka OtaThe Nippon Foundation Nereus Program, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainability standards for seafood mainly address environmental performance criteria and are less concerned with the welfare of fisheries workers who produce the seafood. Yet human rights violations such as slavery and human trafficking are widespread in fisheries around the world, and underscore the need for certification bodies and other seafood supply chain actors to improve social performance, in addition to addressing environmental challenges. Calls for socially responsible seafood have referenced human rights law and policy frameworks to shape the guiding principles of socially responsible seafood and to provide the legal machinery to implement these aspirations, but practical guidance on how to achieve this is lacking. To provide clarity on this challenge, we reviewed the literature concerning human rights in the seafood supply chain, and prepared an analysis of opportunities and challenges to implement socially responsible seafood through relevant human rights, legal and policy instruments. We observe that human rights laws are generally framed in favour of addressing violations of civil and political rights, but there remains considerable scope for applying economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights in this context. Other challenges include weakly defined ESC rights infringements, a lack of straightforward mechanisms to enforce human rights entitlements, and practical difficulties such as resources to support and secure rights. On the positive side, governments can draw on international instruments to inspire national policies and legislation to eliminate illegalities from the seafood supply chain. However, for socially responsible seafood principles to translate into tangible actions, these objectives must be rooted in clear legal obligations and be supported by sufficient national capacity and political will.

Indexed as

Law EnforcementCultureFisheriesHuman RightsHumansHuman TraffickingSeafood

Identifiers

PMID30682056
PMCPMC6347265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.