Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30682026›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Does prior dengue virus exposure worsen clinical outcomes of Zika virus infection? A systematic review, pooled analysis and lessons learned.

Jennifer Masel, Michael K McCracken, Todd Gleeson, Brian Morrison, George Rutherford, Allison Imrie, Richard G Jarman, Michael Koren, Simon Pollett

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer MaselDepartment of Medicine, USUHS, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Michael K McCrackenViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Todd GleesonDepartment of Medicine, USUHS, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Brian MorrisonViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4649-6999
George RutherfordInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Allison ImrieUniversity of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Richard G JarmanViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Michael KorenDepartment of Medicine, USUHS, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Simon PollettViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4450-7028
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · USThe University of Sydney · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) recently caused a pandemic complicated by Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and birth defects. ZIKV is structurally similar to the dengue viruses (DENV) and in vitro studies suggest antibody dependent enhancement occurs in ZIKV infections preceded by DENV; however, the clinical significance of this remains unclear. We undertook a PRISMA-adherent systematic review of all current human and non-human primate (NHP) data to determine if prior infection with DENV, compared to DENV-naïve hosts, is associated with a greater risk of ZIKV clinical complications or greater ZIKV peak viremia in vivo. We identified 1146 studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the grey literature, of which five studies were eligible. One human study indicated no increase in the risk of GBS in ZIKV infections with prior DENV exposure. Two additional human studies showed a small increase in ZIKV viremia in those with prior DENV exposure; however, this was not statistically significant nor was it associated with an increase in clinical severity or adverse pregnancy outcomes. While no meta-analysis was possible using human data, a pooled analysis of the two NHP studies leveraging extended data provided only weak evidence of a 0.39 log10 GE/mL rise in ZIKV viremia in DENV experienced rhesus macaques compared to those with no DENV exposure (p = 0.22). Using a customized quality grading criteria, we further show that no existing published human studies have offered high quality measurement of both acute ZIKV and antecedent DENV infections. In conclusion, limited human and NHP studies indicate a small and non-statistically significant increase in ZIKV viremia in DENV-experienced versus DENV-naïve hosts; however, there is no evidence that even a possible small increase in ZIKV viremia would correlate with a change in ZIKV clinical phenotype. More data derived from larger sample sizes and improved sero-assays are needed to resolve this question, which has major relevance for clinical prognosis and vaccine design.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralDengueDengue VirusGuillain-Barre SyndromeHumansMacaca mulattaMEDLINEMiceModels, AnimalViremiaZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID30682026
PMCPMC6370234
OpenAlexW2914629057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.