Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30681957›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement2019

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Implementation of a Performance Measurement System for South Africa's Substance Use Treatment Services.

Bronwyn Myers, Petal Petersen Williams, Rajen Govender, Ron Manderscheid, J Randy Koch

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COVID 19-impact on substance use treatment utilization and provision in South Africa.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. System Performance Measurement: Implications for Service Planning.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bronwyn MyersAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Petal Petersen WilliamsAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rajen GovenderDepartment of Sociology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ron ManderscheidNational Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors, Washington, DC.
J Randy KochDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMinimal knowledge exists on the factors that affect implementation of performance measurement systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address this, we describe the implementation of a performance measurement system for South Africa's substance abuse treatment services known as the Service Quality Measures (SQM) initiative.

methodWe conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of system implementation. We surveyed 81 providers about the extent of system implementation within their agencies and the factors that facilitated implementation. We conducted 26 in-depth interviews of providers' perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation.

resultsThe overall penetration of this system was high. Almost all providers viewed the system as feasible to implement, acceptable, appropriate for use in their context, and useful for guiding service improvements. However, the extent of implementation varied significantly across sites (p < .05). Leadership support (p < .05) was associated with increased implementation in multivariable analyses. Providers reflected that high rates of patient attrition, variability in willingness to implement the system, and limited capacity for interpreting performance feedback affected the extent of system implementation.

conclusionsIt is feasible to implement a performance measurement system in LMICs if the system is acceptable, appropriate, and useful to providers. To ensure the utility of this system for treatment service strengthening, system implementation must be optimized. Efforts to enhance target population coverage, strengthen leadership support for performance measurement, and build capacity for performance feedback utilization may enhance the implementation of this performance measurement system.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareSouth AfricaSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID30681957
PMCPMC6377018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.