Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30681904›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2019

GenBio-MAPS: A Programmatic Assessment to Measure Student Understanding of Vision and Change Core Concepts across General Biology Programs.

Brian A Couch, Christian D Wright, Scott Freeman, Jennifer K Knight, Katharine Semsar, Michelle K Smith, Mindi M Summers, Yi Zheng, Alison J Crowe, Sara E Brownell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Examining Science Practices in an Introductory Biology Laboratory Curriculum.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Examining the influence ofJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2025
    Article
  8. Community college biology students' understanding ofJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brian A CouchSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588.
Christian D WrightSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.
Scott FreemanDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Jennifer K KnightDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
Katharine SemsarMiramontes Arts and Sciences Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
Michelle K SmithDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Mindi M SummersDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Yi Zheng**Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.
Alison J CroweDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Sara E BrownellSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Vision and Change report provides a nationally agreed upon framework of core concepts that undergraduate biology students should master by graduation. While identifying these concepts was an important first step, departments also need ways to measure the extent to which students understand these concepts. Here, we present the General Biology-Measuring Achievement and Progression in Science (GenBio-MAPS) assessment as a tool to measure student understanding of the core concepts at key time points in a biology degree program. Data from more than 5000 students at 20 institutions reveal that this instrument distinguishes students at different stages of the curriculum, with an upward trend of increased performance at later time points. Despite this trend, we identify several concepts that advanced students find challenging. Linear mixed-effects models reveal that gender, race/ethnicity, English-language status, and first-generation status predict overall performance and that different institutions show distinct performance profiles across time points. GenBio-MAPS represents the first programmatic assessment for general biology programs that spans the breadth of biology and aligns with the Vision and Change core concepts. This instrument provides a needed tool to help departments monitor student learning and guide curricular transformation centered on the teaching of core concepts.

Indexed as

ComprehensionEducational MeasurementStudentsBiologyCurriculumDemographyFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMale

Identifiers

PMID30681904
PMCPMC6757222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.