SynthesisMedicine2019
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluating the pathologic response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ultrasound-based radiomics for early predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.La Radiologia medica · 2024Pooled it
- A Canadian national guideline on the neoadjuvant treatment of invasive breast cancer, including patient assessment, systemic therapy, and local management principles.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Guideline
- Article
- Correlation of paracancerous area ultrasound characteristics and the 21-gene recurrence score: the clinical value for early-stage luminal A invasive breast cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the pathological response of breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnosis and efficacy prediction of primary breast lymphoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Ceusia-Breast: computer-aided diagnosis with contrast enhanced ultrasound image analysis for breast lesions.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Ultrasound Breast Imaging: From Industry to Clinical Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer evaluated using strain ultrasonic elastography.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Contrast enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters for assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2021Observational
- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Treatment Modulation of Breast Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- A Narrative Review of Ultrasound Technologies for the Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2021Review
- Article
- Review
- What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRecent reports have suggested that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be used to monitor the pathologic responses of breast cancer (BC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); however, the diagnostic performance of CEUS in BC has yet to be confirmed. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of related studies to explore the relationship between CEUS and pathologic responses of BC to NAC. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for studies published until September 31, 2018. Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and then ORs with 95% CIs were pooled to estimate the prognostic role of CEUS for the pathologic responses of BC to NAC.
resultsPooled meta-analysis of the 9 eligible studies that included 424 patients indicated the high performance of CEUS for monitoring pathologic responses to NAC (OR = 31.83, 95% CI: 16.69-60.67, P < .001), with no significant heterogeneity (I = 0.0%, P = .529). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 87% (95% CI: 0.81-0.92), 84% (95% CI: 0.74-0.91), 5.5 (95% CI: 3.3-9.2), 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10-0.23), and 36 (95% CI: 18-70), respectively. An area under the curve of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94) suggests a high ability for prognostic detection. Although Begg's funnel plot (P = .057) indicated the presence of publication bias among the included studies, the trim-and-fill method verified the stability of the pooled outcomes. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the pooled OR was robust.
conclusionOur results suggest that CEUS has a high diagnostic performance for the pathologic responses of BC to NAC. Further and better-designed studies should be performed to verify the clinical applications of CEUS for monitoring BC responses to NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.