ArticleMedicine2019
Improvement in quality of life of Chinese chronic heart failure patients with neuropsychiatric complications over 12-months post-treatment with metoprolol.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health-related quality of life and associated factors in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients at University of Gondar Hospital, Ethiopia.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological disorders, such as depression and anxiety, are known to be associated with chronic heart failure (CHF). The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of mental status on quality of life (QoL) in metoprolol treated CHF patients with depression, anxiety, and burn-out.This single-center prospective study was conducted between February 2013 and April 2016, enrolled CHF patients (resting heart rate >80 bpm) with depression, anxiety, and burn out at baseline. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and Copenhagen burnout inventory (CBI) were used to assess the depression-anxiety status and burn-out status, respectively. Change in QoL was evaluated as the endpoint at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month from baseline using Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and short form-8 (SF-8) scales. A student t test was used to determine the change and P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. One hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled (median age 66 years; 65.58% males) and divided into 8 groups based on the HADS and CBI scores at baseline. Overall, the mean SF8 score and MLHFQ scores in different mental status groups showed a significant improvement (P < .05) in QoL from baseline to 12th month, with no significant difference reported between the groups. With regard to the follow-up periods, there was a deterioration in QoL until 3rd month, after which there was a significant improvement (P < .05).There was a significant improvement in QoL in metoprolol treated CHF patients with depression, anxiety, and burn-out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.