ArticleMedicine2019
A study of affecting the recovery of Chinese patients with Bell palsy.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of acupuncture intervention from the acute phase or the non-acute phase in patients with peripheral facial paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Cathelicidin-derived antiviral peptide inhibits herpes simplex virus 1 infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Does acute-phase acupuncture at Hegu (LI04) promote facial nerve regeneration and upregulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway? A hypothesis-generating study in a rabbit crush injury model.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explored the risk factors for preventing recovery of Bell palsy (BP) in Chinese inpatients. Five hundred thirteen patients were included. The two end-points of assessment were the discharge and final follow-up results. Relationship between discharge and baseline: long patients delay (unhealed 4.03 ± 1.16 d vs improved 2.24 ± 1.0 d, P < .001), combined diseases (yes 77.06% vs no 86.71%, P = .01), and early use of acupuncture (yes 47.46% vs no 97.62%, P < .001) were bad factors. Therapeutic factors and discharge: only use of steroids was a positive factor (yes 92.54% vs no 57.30%, P < .001). Binary logistic regression found that early use of steroids was a favorable factor (P = .001), while early use of acupuncture (P < .001) and long patient delay (P < .001) were adverse factors. Subgroups analysis showed early use of steroids plus antivirals (steroids + antivirals vs antivirals + mecobalamin, P < .001) and early use of steroids plus mecobalamin were good choices (steroids + antivirals vs steroids + mecobalamin, P = .745), while early use of antivirals plus mecobalamin was a bad choice (vs other 2 groups, P < .001). Effect of drug dose and treatment course on discharge: long time use of steroids didn't mean good efficacy (unhealed 10.80 ± 1.53 d vs improved 10.38 ± 1.21 d, P = .026). Final follow-up results: improved patients were better than that of unhealed at discharge (P < .001). Risk factors of discharge included long patient delay, combined diseases, and early use of acupuncture. Steroids plus antivirals or steroids plus mecobalamin were good choices for treatment. Long time use of steroids didn't mean good effect. Improved patients at discharge had better results finally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.