Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30681391›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Association of Primary Care Providers' Beliefs of Statins for Primary Prevention and Statin Prescription.

Jeffrey D Clough, Seth S Martin, Ann Marie Navar, Li Lin, N Chantelle Hardy, Ursula Rogers, Lesley H Curtis

Open access · goldFull text readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey D Clough1 Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC.
Seth S Martin5 Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease Division of Cardiology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Ann Marie Navar1 Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC.
Li Lin3 Department of Population Health Sciences Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC.
N Chantelle Hardy3 Department of Population Health Sciences Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC.
Ursula Rogers4 Department of Duke Forge Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC.
Lesley H Curtis1 Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC.
Duke University · USClinical Research Institute · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USRogers (United States) · US

Funding

Preventing Cardiovascular Disease through Improved Risk Prediction and CommunicationK01HL133416 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NAVAR, ANN MARIE · 2016 to 2020
$707k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL133416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Treatment Guideline increased the number of primary prevention patients eligible for statin therapy, yet uptake of these guidelines has been modest. Little is known of how primary care provider ( PCP ) beliefs influence statin prescription. Methods and Results We surveyed 164 PCP s from a community-based North Carolina network in 2017 about statin therapy. We evaluated statin initiation among the PCP s' statin-eligible patients between 2014 and 2015 without a previous prescription. Seventy-two PCP s (43.9%) completed the survey. The median estimate of the relative risk reduction for high-intensity statins was 45% (interquartile range, 25%-50%). A minority of providers (27.8%) believed statins caused diabetes mellitus, and only 16.7% reported always/very often discussing this with patients. Most PCPs (97.2%) believed that statins cause myopathy, and 72.3% reported always/very often discussing this with patients. Most (77.7%) reported always/very often using the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk calculator, although many reported that in most cases other risk factors or patient preferences influenced prescribing (59.8% and 43.1%, respectively). Of 6172 statin-eligible patients, 22.3% received a prescription for a moderate- or high-intensity statin at follow-up. Providers reporting greater reliance on risk factors beyond atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk were less likely to prescribe statins. Conclusions Although beliefs and approaches to statin discussions vary among community PCP s, new prescription rates are low and minimally associated with those beliefs. These results highlight the complexity of increasing statin prescriptions for primary prevention and suggest that strategies to facilitate standardized discussions and to address external influences on patient beliefs warrant future study.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareAdultAmerican Heart AssociationCardiologyCardiovascular DiseasesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsguideline adherencepreventionshared decision makingstatin

Identifiers

PMID30681391
PMCPMC6405576
OpenAlexW2911296353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.