ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019
Association of Primary Care Providers' Beliefs of Statins for Primary Prevention and Statin Prescription.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidental Coronary Artery Calcium: Opportunistic Screening of Previous Nongated Chest Computed Tomography Scans to Improve Statin Rates (NOTIFY-1 Project).Circulation · 2023Trial
- Prescription of Lipid-Lowering and Antihypertensive Drugs Following Pictorial Information About Subclinical Atherosclerosis: A Secondary Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Effect of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Statin Myopathy Risk vs Usual Care on Blood Cholesterol: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Physician Education and Peer Comparisons to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Among People Living with HIV: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Strengths and Weakness of the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Calculation: A Qualitative Study.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Diabetes: An Analysis From MESA.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Statins for primary prevention in multimorbid patients: to prescribe or not to prescribe? A qualitative analysis of general practitioners' decision-making processes.Family practice · 2025Article
- Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use When Indicated and Subsequent Ischemic Stroke Severity.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Effects of Statin Therapy on Glycemic Control and Associated Factors Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Northeastern Tanzania: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2025Article
- Association of statin use after renal replacement therapy with mortality in patients with dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
- A Cohort Analysis of Statin Treatment Patterns Among Small-Sized Primary Care Practices.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Time to initiation of lipid-lowering drugs for subclinical atherosclerosis: sub-study of VIPVIZA randomized controlled trial, with single-arm cross-over.European heart journal open · 2022Article
- Applying the behavior change wheel to design de-implementation strategies to reduce low-value statin prescription in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Multimorbidity and statin prescription for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: A cross-sectional study in general practice in France.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Correlation Between Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Statin Prescribing Patterns.American health & drug benefits · 2021Article
- A simplified approach to identification of risk status in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2021Article
- Prevalence of statin utilization and adherence among privately insured subjects in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2021Article
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Not Using Primary Prevention Statin Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Impact of cardiologist intervention on guideline-directed use of statin therapy.World journal of cardiology · 2020Article
- Projections of incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and incident type 2 diabetes across evolving statin treatment guidelines and recommendations: A modelling study.PLoS medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Treatment Guideline increased the number of primary prevention patients eligible for statin therapy, yet uptake of these guidelines has been modest. Little is known of how primary care provider ( PCP ) beliefs influence statin prescription. Methods and Results We surveyed 164 PCP s from a community-based North Carolina network in 2017 about statin therapy. We evaluated statin initiation among the PCP s' statin-eligible patients between 2014 and 2015 without a previous prescription. Seventy-two PCP s (43.9%) completed the survey. The median estimate of the relative risk reduction for high-intensity statins was 45% (interquartile range, 25%-50%). A minority of providers (27.8%) believed statins caused diabetes mellitus, and only 16.7% reported always/very often discussing this with patients. Most PCPs (97.2%) believed that statins cause myopathy, and 72.3% reported always/very often discussing this with patients. Most (77.7%) reported always/very often using the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk calculator, although many reported that in most cases other risk factors or patient preferences influenced prescribing (59.8% and 43.1%, respectively). Of 6172 statin-eligible patients, 22.3% received a prescription for a moderate- or high-intensity statin at follow-up. Providers reporting greater reliance on risk factors beyond atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk were less likely to prescribe statins. Conclusions Although beliefs and approaches to statin discussions vary among community PCP s, new prescription rates are low and minimally associated with those beliefs. These results highlight the complexity of increasing statin prescriptions for primary prevention and suggest that strategies to facilitate standardized discussions and to address external influences on patient beliefs warrant future study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.