School achievement and adolescent self-harm: methodological issues may have led to misleading conclusions in a highly powered national study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparing Ruminative and Distracting Responses and Emotion Regulation Difficulties in Early Community Adolescents With and Without Self-Harm.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2024
   Article
2. Educational attainment trajectories among children and adolescents with depression, and the role of sociodemographic characteristics: longitudinal data-linkage study.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Authors' reply.2019
• Comment on
  School achievement as a predictor of depression and self-harm in adolescence: linked education and health record study.2018

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as