Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680852›Full record

Trial reportPsycho-oncology2019

A randomized controlled trial of 24 weeks of varenicline for tobacco use among cancer patients: Efficacy, safety, and adherence.

Robert Schnoll, Frank Leone, Anna Veluz-Wilkins, Andrew Miele, Anita Hole, Nancy C Jao, E Paul Wileyto, Allison J Carroll, Ravi Kalhan, Jyoti Patel and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Systematic Review of Smoking Cessation Interventions for Smokers Diagnosed with Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pilot Trial of a Behavioral Economics-Informed Clinical Decision Support Alert to Improve Inpatient Tobacco Use Treatment Rates.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  5. A qualitative study of attitudes and perceptions of smoking cessation medication among patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert SchnollDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4089-856X
Frank LeonePulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anna Veluz-WilkinsDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Andrew MieleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anita HoleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nancy C JaoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
E Paul WileytoDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Allison J CarrollDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-3576-8808
Ravi KalhanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Jyoti PatelDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Corey LangerDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Su Fen LubitzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brian HitsmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Pennsylvania · USNorthwestern University · USPulmonary and Allergy Associates · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Extended Duration Varenicline for Smoking Among Cancer Patients: A Clinical TrialR01CA165001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHNOLL, ROBERT ADAM · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
A Patient-Oriented Research Mentoring Program in Tobacco Dependence ResearchK24DA045244 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert Adam Schnoll · 2018 to 2026
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165001NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA045244NIH HHS K24 DA045244NIH HHS R01 CA165001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveContinuing to smoke after a cancer diagnosis undermines prognosis. Yet few trials have tested Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved tobacco use medications in this population. Extended use varenicline may represent an effective treatment for cancer patients who smoke given barriers to cessation including a prolonged time line for relapse.

methodsA placebo-controlled randomized trial tested 12 weeks of varenicline plus 12 weeks of placebo (standard [ST]) vs 24 weeks of varenicline (extended [ET]) with seven counseling sessions for treatment-seeking cancer patients who smoke (N = 207). Primary outcomes were 7-day biochemically confirmed abstinence at weeks 24 and 52. Treatment adherence and side effects, adverse and serious adverse events, and blood pressure were assessed.

resultsPoint prevalence and continuous abstinence quit rates at weeks 24 and 52 were not significantly different across treatment arms (P's > 0.05). Adherence (43% of sample) significantly interacted with treatment arm for week 24 point prevalence (odds ratio [OR] = 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-4.63; P = 0.02) and continuous (OR = 5.82; 95% CI, 2.66-12.71; P < 0.001) abstinence. For both outcomes, adherent participants who received ET reported higher abstinence (60.5% and 44.2%) vs ST (44.7% and 27.7%), but differences in quit rates between arms were not significant for nonadherent participants (ET: 9.7% and 4.8%; ST: 12.7% and 10.9%). There were no significant differences between treatment arms on side effects, adverse and serious adverse events, and rates of high blood pressure (P's > 0.05).

conclusionsCompared with ST, ET varenicline does not increase patient risk and increases smoking cessation rates among patients who adhere to treatment. Studies are needed to identify effective methods to increase medication adherence to treat patient tobacco use effectively.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultBenzazepinesCounselingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNicotineSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking Cessation AgentsSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTreatment OutcomeVareniclineBenzazepinesNicotineSmoking Cessation AgentsVareniclineadherencecancerextended treatmentsafetysmoking cessationvarenicline

Identifiers

PMID30680852
PMCPMC6936106
OpenAlexW2914865446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.