Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680767›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2019

Analysis of combined incident and prevalent cohort data under a proportional mean residual life model.

Chi Hyun Lee, Jing Ning, Richard J Kryscio, Yu Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Further Results on the Proportional Vitalities Model.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chi Hyun LeeDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-6340-2718
Jing NingDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Richard J KryscioDepartment of Biostatistics, Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Yu ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Core Center - Biomarker CoreP30AG028383 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SCHMITT, FREDERICK · 2006 to 2020
$23.3M
Role of impaired cognitive states & risk factors in conversion to mixed dementiasR01AG038651 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ABNER, ERIN, KRYSCIO, RICHARD J. · 2011 to 2023
$6.1M
Comparative Effectiveness of Cancer Research: Use Data from Multiple SourcesR01CA193878 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI NING, JING · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193878NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028383NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Nun Study, a longitudinal study to examine risk factors for the progression of dementia, consists of subjects who were already diagnosed with dementia (ie, prevalent cohort) and those who do not have dementia (ie, incident cohort) at study enrollment. When assessing the risk factors' effects on the survival time from dementia diagnosis until death, utilizing data from both cohorts supports more efficient statistical inference because the two cohorts provide valuable complementary information. A major challenge in analyzing the combined cohort data is that the prevalent cases are not representative of the target population. Moreover, the dates of dementia diagnosis are not ascertained for the prevalent cohort in the Nun Study. Hence, the survival time for the prevalent cohort is only partially observed from study enrollment until death or censoring, with the time from dementia diagnosis to study enrollment missing. In this paper, we propose an efficient estimation method that uses both incident and prevalent cohorts under the proportional mean residual life model. By assuming proportionality of the mean residual life time with covariates in the incident cohort, we can utilize the natural relationship between the mean residual life function and the hazard function of the survival time measured from enrollment until death for the prevalent cohort. We evaluate the efficiency gain from using the combined cohort data through simulations and demonstrate that the proposed method is valid and efficient.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesIncidencePrevalenceProportional Hazards ModelsAgedAged, 80 and overComputer SimulationDementiaDisease ProgressionFemaleHumanscombined cohort dataincident cohortNun Studyprevalent cohortproportional hazards modelproportional mean residual life model

Identifiers

PMID30680767
PMCPMC6461486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.