Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680733›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2019

The effect of Zika virus infection in the ferret.

Elizabeth B Hutchinson, Mitali Chatterjee, Laura Reyes, Francis T Djankpa, William G Valiant, Bernard Dardzinski, Joseph J Mattapallil, Carlo Pierpaoli, Sharon L Juliano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Mechanisms of Zika astrocyte infection and neuronal toxicity.NeuroImmune pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Ferret as a Model System for Neocortex Development and Evolution.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  7. The effect of Zika virus infection in the ferret.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth B HutchinsonQuantitative Medical Imaging Section, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mitali ChatterjeeDepartment of Anatomy Physiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland.
Laura ReyesQuantitative Medical Imaging Section, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0404-1817
Francis T DjankpaProgram in Neuroscience, USUHS, Bethesda, Maryland.
William G ValiantProgram in Emerging and Infectious Disease, Bethesda, Maryland.
Bernard DardzinskiDepartment of Radiology, Bethesda, Maryland.
Joseph J MattapallilDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Bethesda, Maryland.
Carlo PierpaoliQuantitative Medical Imaging Section, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sharon L JulianoProgram in Neuroscience, USUHS, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-9346-7974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although initial observations of infections with the Zika virus describe a mild illness, more recent reports show that infections by Zika result in neurotropism. In 2015, substantial congenital malformations were observed, with numerous infants born with microcephaly in Brazil. To study the underlying mechanism and effects of the disease, it is critical to find suitable animal models. Rodents lack an immune system parallel to humans and also have lissencephalic brains, which are likely to react differently to infections. As the smallest gyrencephalic mammal, ferrets may provide an important animal model to study the Zika virus, as their brains share many characteristics with humans. To evaluate the prospect of using ferrets to study Zika virus infection, we injected seven pregnant jills with the PR strain subcutaneously on gestational day 21, corresponding to the initiation of corticogenesis. These injections resulted in mixed effects. Two animals died of apparent infection, and all kits were resorbed in another animal that did not die. The other four animals remained pregnant until gestational day 40, when the kits were delivered by caesarian section. We evaluated the animals using CT, MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and immunohistochemistry. The kits displayed a number of features compatible with an infection that impacted both the brain and skull. The outcomes, however, were variable and differed within and across litters, which ranged from the absence of observable abnormalities to prominent changes, suggesting differential vulnerability of kits to infection by the Zika virus or to subsequent mechanisms of neurodevelopmental disruption.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBrainFerretsZika Virus InfectionCTdiffusion tensor MRImicrocephalyneural developmentneural progenitorRRID:AB_11217435RRID:AB_234119RRID:AB_609914RRID:AB_726362vasculature

Identifiers

PMID30680733
PMCPMC6593673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.