ArticleInternational journal of hematology2019
A case of double-refractory multiple myeloma with both the IgH-MMSET fusion protein and the congenital abnormality t(11;22).
Article in International journal of hematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 67-year-old female was referred to our hospital with a sternal fracture in March 2008. She received a diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) BJP-κ type (ISS stage III). G-banding karyotype revealed 46, XX, t(11;22)(q23.3;q11.2) (Hubacek, Gene 592:193-9, 2016), which was later confirmed to be congenital. After repeated rounds of chemotherapy with bortezomib and lenalidomide, she obtained a very good partial response in August 2014, and she was followed up with no treatment. However, she relapsed in February 2016. At that time, fluorescence in situ hybridization identified del(13q) and t(4;14)(p16;q32), which are associated with a poor prognosis. Furthermore, PCR analysis showed that the chromosome 11 breakpoint was at the APOA5/APOA4 locus at 11q23.3, which is associated with malignancy, and that the chromosome 22 breakpoint was at the SEPT5 intron 1 locus, which also plays a role in leukemogenesis through formation of a fusion gene with MLL. Although she was treated with three further lines of therapy, she died from disease progression in August 2017. Synergism between t(11;22) and t(4;14) may have induced the double-refractory phenotype to proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide, at least during the chemorefractory phase. We present a biological analysis of this case and a review of the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.