Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680659›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2019

Dissecting the predictive value of MAPK/AKT/estrogen-receptor phosphorylation axis in primary breast cancer to treatment response for tamoxifen over exemestane: a Translational Report of the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES)-PathIES.

Zsolt Szijgyarto, Koen D Flach, Mark Opdam, Carlo Palmieri, Sabine C Linn, Jelle Wesseling, Simak Ali, Judith M Bliss, Maggie Chon U Cheang, Wilbert Zwart and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New insights into acquired endocrine resistance of breast cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zsolt SzijgyartoClinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-4094
Koen D FlachDivision of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark OpdamDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carlo PalmieriDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK.
Sabine C LinnDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jelle WesselingDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Simak AliDepartment of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Judith M BlissClinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Maggie Chon U CheangClinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Wilbert ZwartDivision of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R Charles CoombesDepartment of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. c.coombes@imperial.ac.uk.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLInstitute of Cancer Research · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12011Cancer Research UK 18784Cancer Research UK 25351Cancer Research UK C1491/A15955Cancer Research UK C37/A18784Cancer Research UK C37/A8434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prognostic and predictive values of the MAPK/AKT/ERα phosphorylation axis (pT202/T204MAPK, pT308AKT, pS473AKT, pS118ERα and pS167ERα) in primary tumours were assessed to determine whether these markers can differentiate between patient responses for switching adjuvant endocrine therapy after 2-3 years from tamoxifen to exemestane and continued tamoxifen monotherapy in the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES).

methodsOf the 4724 patients in IES, 1506 were managed in a subset of centres (N = 89) participating in PathIES. These centres recruited 1282 (85%, 1282/1506) women into PathIES of whom 1036 had phospho-marker data. All phospho-markers were analysed by immunohistochemistry staining. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models of the phospho-markers for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were adjusted for clinicopathological factors. Treatment effects on the biomarker expression were determined by interaction tests. Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment for multiple testing with a false discovery rate of 10% was applied (p

resultsPhospho-T202/T204MAPK, pS118ERα and pS167ERα were all found to be correlated (p

conclusionsThis PathIES study confirmed previously described associations between the phosphorylation site markers of AKT, MAPK and ERα activity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. No prognostic correlations between the phosphorylation markers and clinical outcome were found, nor were they predictive for clinical outcomes among patients who switched therapy over those treated with tamoxifen alone.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAndrostadienesAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPhosphorylationPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktAndrostadienesAntineoplastic AgentsexemestaneMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenAromataseBiomarkersBreast cancerPrognosisTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID30680659
PMCPMC6491661
OpenAlexW2913288598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.