Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680574›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Macrolide prescription in Dutch children: compliance with guidelines.

Rosa A M Bandell, Tanja Dekkers, Bernardus A Semmekrot, Saskia N de Wildt, Hanneke W H A Fleuren, Margaretha F Warlé-van Herwaarden, Peter Füssenich, Gerardus P Gerrits, Cornelis Kramers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current perspectives on atypical pneumonia in children.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa A M BandellDepartment of Pediatrics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. r.bandell@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2285-9065
Tanja DekkersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bernardus A SemmekrotDepartment of Pediatrics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Saskia N de WildtDepartment of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hanneke W H A FleurenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Margaretha F Warlé-van HerwaardenCommunity Pharmacy, Groesbeek, The Netherlands.
Peter FüssenichGeneral Practice, Füssenich and Dral, Groesbeek, The Netherlands.
Gerardus P GerritsDepartment of Pediatrics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelis KramersDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For reasons of antibiotic resistance and side effects, macrolides should be prescribed with care in the pediatric population. We evaluated the adherence to Dutch guidelines of macrolide prescription in children and estimated the risk of Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated pneumonia based on Fischer's decision tree. In this retrospective study, we included children aged 0-18 years who were treated with azithromycin or clarithromycin for pulmonary disease in four settings from general practice to hospital ward for (1) the prescriptions not in accordance with the guideline of the Dutch Association of Pediatrics and (2) the risk of M. pneumoniae in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) according to Fischer's decision tree. The latter suggests that children older than three years with a fever lasting more than two days are at high risk for M. pneumoniae and that it is therefore justified to treat them with macrolides. In total, 189 macrolide prescriptions from 2015 until 2017 were analyzed: 139 children used macrolides for a pulmonary indication (75%); 18% (n = 25) of the prescriptions were not in accordance with Dutch guidelines. Only 9.1% of patients with CAP were classified as having a high risk of M. pneumoniae according to Fischer's decision tree. A significant proportion of macrolide prescriptions for Dutch children with a pulmonary disease appears not to be in accordance with the guidelines. Most patients with CAP treated with a macrolide actually had a low risk of having M. pneumoniae according to Fischer's decision tree. Both observations suggest overuse of macrolides in children.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDrug PrescriptionsDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInappropriate PrescribingInfantInfant, NewbornMacrolidesMaleMycoplasma pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolidesInfectious disease medicineMicrobiologyPharmacologyRespiratory disorders

Identifiers

PMID30680574
OpenAlexW2911646862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.