Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680565›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Clinical outcome of pharmacist-led prospective audit with intervention and feedback after expansion from patients using specific antibiotics to those using whole injectable antibiotics.

Kengo Ohashi, Tomoko Matsuoka, Yasutaka Shinoda, Takayuki Mori, Shinya Yoshida, Tomoaki Yoshimura, Tadashi Sugiyama

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Practical and clinical significance of the pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kengo OhashiDepartment of Pharmacy, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa-cho, Ogaki-city, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan. jamyway.kengo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-7982
Tomoko MatsuokaDepartment of Pharmacy, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa-cho, Ogaki-city, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan.
Yasutaka ShinodaDepartment of Pharmacy, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa-cho, Ogaki-city, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan.
Takayuki MoriDepartment of Pharmacy, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa-cho, Ogaki-city, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan.
Shinya YoshidaDepartment of Pharmacy, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa-cho, Ogaki-city, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan.
Tomoaki YoshimuraDepartment of Pharmacy, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa-cho, Ogaki-city, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan.
Tadashi SugiyamaLaboratory of Pharmacy Practice and Social Science, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Gifu, Japan.
Ogaki Municipal Hospital · JPGifu Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective audit with intervention and feedback (PAF) and preauthorisation of antimicrobials are core strategies for antimicrobial stewardship (AS). PAF participants were expanded from patients using specific antibiotics to those using whole injectable antibiotics to evaluate clinical outcome. From January 2016 to December 2016, PAF was performed in patients using specific antibiotics (period 1) and from January 2017 to December 2017, PAF was performed in patients using whole injectable antibiotics (period 2). PAF was implemented for 5 days every week by pharmacists involved in infectious diseases chemotherapy. In total, 11,571 and 11,103 patients used antibiotic injections during periods 1 and 2, respectively. No significant difference in mortality within 30 days from the initial use of injection antibiotics was observed. The average duration of hospitalisation was significantly shorter during period 2 among patients using antibiotics; however, this was not significantly different from that of patients not receiving antibiotics. The average duration of therapy for intravenous antibiotics was significantly shorter during period 2 than during period 1. The ratio of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to S. aureus was significantly low during period 2. The duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy for Escherichia coli bacteraemia during period 2 decreased significantly. De-escalation and appropriate antimicrobial treatment rates at specific doses during period 2 increased significantly. Expansion of patients eligible for PAF from patients using specific antibiotics to patients using whole injectable antibiotics shortened hospital stays, suppressed drug resistance, and promoted the appropriate use of antibiotics.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipPharmacistsAdministration, IntravenousControlled Before-After StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug UtilizationHumansJapanLength of StayMedical OveruseProgram EvaluationAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobial stewardshipInterventionJapanPharmacistProspective audit with intervention and feedback

Identifiers

PMID30680565
OpenAlexW2912280820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.