Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680559›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test for detection of dengue infection using a single-tag hybridization chromatographic-printed array strip format.

Veni R Liles, Lady-Anne S Pangilinan, Maria Luisa G Daroy, Maria Terrese A Dimamay, Rachel S Reyes, Mick Kelvin Bulusan, Mark Pierre S Dimamay, Paolo Antonio S Luna, Abigail Mercado, Gaowa Bai and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Veni R LilesResearch and Biotechnology Group, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Lady-Anne S PangilinanResearch and Biotechnology Group, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Maria Luisa G DaroyResearch and Biotechnology Group, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Maria Terrese A DimamayResearch and Biotechnology Group, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Rachel S ReyesResearch and Biotechnology Group, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Mick Kelvin BulusanResearch and Biotechnology Group, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Mark Pierre S DimamayResearch and Biotechnology Group, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Paolo Antonio S LunaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Abigail MercadoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Gaowa BaiDepartment of Health Science and Social Welfare, Kibi International University, Takahashi, Japan.
Haorile Chagan-YasutanDepartment of Health Science and Social Welfare, Kibi International University, Takahashi, Japan.
Yutaka TakaradaTohoku Bio-Array Co., Ltd., Sendai, Japan.
Mitsuo KawaseTohoku Bio-Array Co., Ltd., Sendai, Japan.
Toshio HattoriDepartment of Health Science and Social Welfare, Kibi International University, Takahashi, Japan. hattorit@kiui.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0947-7625
St. Luke's Medical Center · PHKibi International University · JPInner Mongolia International Mongolian Hospital · CNTohoku University · JP

Funding

Tohoku Bureau of Economy, Trade, and Industry and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) JP17H01690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A dipstick DNA chromatography assay, a single-tag hybridization-printed array strip (STH-PAS), was evaluated for its efficacy to detect dengue virus (DENV). Reverse-transcribed DNA was amplified by PCR, and the amplified DNA was detected using the STH-PAS system. The method was evaluated using stored RNA samples previously identified to carry all 4 serotypes of dengue, chikungunya, and influenza viruses. Clinical performance was also assessed in a prospective study using plasma from 269 febrile cases from the Emergency Department of St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines, and 30 afebrile normal healthy volunteers. A Taqman real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assay and a rapid Dengue NS1 test, SD Bioline, were used for comparison. The STH-PAS system was more sensitive in detecting dengue infection compared to Taqman RT-PCR. For DENV serotypes 1, 2, and 3, the detection was 1 to 2 dilutions (10-fold) higher, and for DENV serotype 4, the detection was 2-4 dilutions higher. In clinical studies, the STH-PAS system showed 100% sensitivity with 88.9% and 86.6% specificities compared to Taqman RT-PCR and SD Dengue Duo NS1 test, respectively. The STH-PAS system was found to have a superior sensitivity than the Taqman system. Further evaluation of its performance in the field may provide important data to extend its usefulness for surveillance and epidemiological research in outbreak situations.

Indexed as

ChromatographyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDengueDengue VirusDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhilippinesProspective StudiesRNA, ViralDenguePolymerase chain reactionRapid diagnosticsSTH-PAS

Identifiers

PMID30680559
OpenAlexW2914122742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.