Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680555›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing in blood culture diagnostics performed by direct inoculation using the VITEK®-2 and BD Phoenix™ platforms.

Steffen Höring, Alain Sami Massarani, Bettina Löffler, Jürgen Rödel

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing bloodstream infection diagnosis: Implementation of the EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST) with automated digital imaging.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steffen HöringInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. steffen.hoering@med.uni-jena.de.
Alain Sami MassaraniInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Bettina LöfflerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jürgen RödelInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early availability of microbiological results can improve treatment decisions of patients suffering from bloodstream infections. Direct inoculation of automated susceptibility testing (AST) platforms is an approach to shorten time-to-result in blood culture diagnostics. We performed a comparative evaluation of the two commercial AST systems VITEK®-2 and BD Phoenix™ for the direct inoculation with blood culture samples. Furthermore, two different methods of sample preparation were compared in this study. Positive blood cultures were prepared for direct inoculation by use of serum separator tubes and twofold centrifugation. AST was performed with the VITEK®-2 and the BD Phoenix™ system by the standard method according to the manufacturer's recommendations using subcultures on solid media and by direct inoculation of blood culture samples. A hundred clinical samples from blood cultures were included in this study. Rapid AST by direct inoculation showed inter-test agreement rates ranging from 92.45 to 97.7%. Comparing both AST platforms, the VITEK®-2 system demonstrated a higher test accuracy for direct inoculation. No relevant difference was observed for the two different sample preparation methods. Direct inoculation is an easy and inexpensive approach to obtain early full panel phenotypic AST results in blood culture diagnostics. Sample preparation is sufficiently performed by a simple centrifugation method. Both commercial platforms, the VITEK®-2 and the BD Phoenix™, have proven suitable for the use of direct inoculation.

Indexed as

Blood CultureAnti-Bacterial AgentsAutomation, LaboratoryBacteremiaDiagnostic Tests, RoutineGram-Negative BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSpecimen HandlingAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.