Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680543›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2019

Patient-dependent risk factors for self-perceived leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.

Blaž Mavčič, Drago Dolinar, Borut Pompe, Vane Antolič

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Hip-Sparing Equalization Procedures for Leg-Length Discrepancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Blaž MavčičUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana and Faculty of Medicine, Zaloška 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. blaz.mavcic@kclj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6169-1296
Drago DolinarUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana and Faculty of Medicine, Zaloška 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Borut PompeUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana and Faculty of Medicine, Zaloška 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vane AntoličUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana and Faculty of Medicine, Zaloška 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with equal objective leg length discrepancy (LLD) may have different subjective perceptions of this condition. Our aim was to analyze the effects of gender, age, operated side, surgical approach, body height, body mass index (BMI) and LLD measurements on self-perceived LLD after total hip arthroplasty (THA). MATERIALS AND

methodsObservational cohort study with minimum 5-year follow-up included 159 patients with unilateral primary THA at a single institution, who reported subjective feeling of equal or unequal leg lengths after THA. Gender, age, body height, BMI, surgical approach, preoperative and postoperative absolute/relative/pelvic radiographic LLD measurements were included in direct comparison between groups and multivariate analyses with self-perceived LLD as the outcome variable.

resultsOut of 159 participants, 39% subjectively perceived postoperative LLD, while others reported equal leg lengths. The two groups postoperatively differed in the median relative LLD (10 mm vs. 5 mm; p = 0.01) and WOMAC (230 mm vs. 110 mm; p < 0.01), but not in the pelvic radiographic LLD. After adjustment for gender, age, operated side and surgical approach, postoperative relative LLD (odds ratio 1.38 for each 5 mm increment; 95% CI 1.01-1.74) and combination of BMI < 26 kg/m

conclusionsClinical relative LLD measurements are better predictors of self-perceived postoperative LLD than pelvic radiographic measurements. Patients with smaller body dimensions will more likely report subjective leg length inequality at a given objective LLD, regardless of gender or age.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipBody HeightBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeg Length InequalityMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipPatient Outcome AssessmentPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSelf ReportArthroplastyHipLeg length discrepancySelf-perceived outcome

Identifiers

PMID30680543
OpenAlexW2912498806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.