Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680519›Full record

Observational studyInternational orthopaedics2019

Can surgical site infections be controlled through microbiological surveillance? A three-year laboratory-based surveillance at an orthopaedic unit, retrospective observatory study.

Iwona Pawłowska, Grzegorz Ziółkowski, Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach, Tomasz Bielecki

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Post-DischargeInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antibiotic Stewardship inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iwona PawłowskaDivision of Microbiology and Epidemiology, St. Barbara Specialised Regional Hospital No. 5, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Grzegorz ZiółkowskiSosnowiec Medical College, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Jadwiga Wójkowska-MachDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 18 Czysta St., 31-121, Kraków, Poland. mbmach@cyf-kr.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-0756-1639
Tomasz BieleckiMedical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLMedical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aims of the study were to analyse the surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients operated at an orthopaedic ward and to describe the drug-resistance of the aetiology of those infections. Also, analyse the possibility of SSI control through microbiological surveillance. Additionally, we have studied the information inferred by aggregating cumulative antibiograms for the SSIs of the studied orthopaedic unit.

designCross-sectional studies carried out in 2013-2015. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Unit in Sosnowiec, Poland; 5995 patients, 5239 operations.

methodsRetrospective laboratory-based data collection study of surgical site infections.

resultsSSI incidence rate was 6.6%, in the implantations-hip prosthesis 5.8% and knee prosthesis 5.4%, about 6 times higher compared with European HAI-Net. SSIs were usually caused by Gram-positive bacteria (56%). The prevalence of MDR microorganisms was 22.6%, and mainly concerned the Gram-negative bacilli: 97.6% of Acinetobacter baumannii and 50.0% of Klebsiella pneumoniae were multidrug-resistant. On the basis of what the Formula for Rational Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy analysis has shown, the use of amikacin, imipenem and ciprofloxacin has been recommended as the most efficient in the empirical therapy of SSIs.

conclusionsThe infection control was a significant problem at the studied orthopaedic unit, as evidenced by the SSI incidence rate significantly higher than expected. We suggest implementing the infection control and prevention based on evidence-based medicine, and a unit-based surveillance. A cumulative unit-based antibiogram reflects the drug-susceptibility pattern for the strains from the infections acquired at the unit.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresAnti-Bacterial AgentsCumulative antibiogramLaboratory-based surveillanceMultidrug-resistant microorganismsOrthopaedicsSurgical site infections

Identifiers

PMID30680519
PMCPMC6698262
OpenAlexW2914943074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.