Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680513›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

Polypharmacy in older patients at primary care units in Brazil.

Milena Santos Gomes, Welma Wildes Amorim, Renato Souza Morais, Romana Santos Gama, Lucas Teixeira Graia, Hévila Maciel Queiroga, Márcio Galvão Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Milena Santos GomesPrograma de Mestrado em Saúde Coletiva, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Rio de Contas 58, Quadra 17, Lote 58, Candeias, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, 45055-090, Brazil.
Welma Wildes AmorimCurso de Medicina, Campus de Vitória da Conquista, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Brazil.
Renato Souza MoraisHospital Universitário Prof. Edgard Santos, Salvador, Brazil.
Romana Santos GamaHospital Universitário Prof. Edgard Santos, Salvador, Brazil.
Lucas Teixeira GraiaUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, Laranjeiras, Brazil.
Hévila Maciel QueirogaHospital Universitário Prof. Edgard Santos, Salvador, Brazil.
Márcio Galvão OliveiraPrograma de Mestrado em Saúde Coletiva, Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Rio de Contas 58, Quadra 17, Lote 58, Candeias, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, 45055-090, Brazil. mgalvao@ufba.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5281-7889
Complexo Hospitalar Universitário Professor Edgard Santos · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRSouthwest Bahia State University · BRUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Despite extensive studies of polypharmacy in older patients, no consensus regarding the definition of this practice exists in the literature. Several studies have defined polypharmacy as problematic when considering only the numbers of medications used by patients. Objective This study aimed to assess the prevalence of polypharmacy prescribing by comparing two different definitions (quantitative and qualitative) and evaluating factors associated with this practice in older patients. Setting Twenty-three basic health units. Method A cross-sectional study involving 386 older adults who received a prescription after a medical consultation. Multivariate analyses were conducted using a Poisson regression with robust variance. Main outcome measure The main outcome measures included patients with a prescription of five or more medications (quantitative polypharmacy) and those with a prescription of five or more medications including at least one drug considered potentially inappropriate for older adults (qualitative polypharmacy). Results The frequency of quantitative polypharmacy was 20.5%. The results of an adjusted analysis showed that the frequency of quantitative polypharmacy was associated with a higher number of self-reported morbidities and the prescription of potentially inappropriate drugs. The prevalence of qualitative polypharmacy was 10.4%, and after adjustment, this outcome remained significantly associated with the presence of three or more self-reported morbidities. Conclusions The presence of multiple comorbidities was identified as the main factor associated with the prescription of both quantitative and qualitative polypharmacy.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyTerminology as TopicAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesBrazilOlder peoplePolypharmacyPotentially inappropriate medicationsPrescription drugsPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID30680513
OpenAlexW2912573545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.