Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680489›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2019

Little effect of 0.01% atropine eye drops as used in myopia prevention on the pattern electroretinogram.

Lisa-Marie Anders, Sven P Heinrich, Wolf A Lagrèze, Lutz Joachimsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of eccentric fixation on the steady-state pattern electroretinogram.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  3. Macular function in patients with medium myopia.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  4. Electroretinogram responses in myopia: a review.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The acute effect of atropine eye drops on the human full-field electroretinogram.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa-Marie AndersEye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. lisamarie.anders@yahoo.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-6007
Sven P HeinrichEye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Wolf A LagrèzeEye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Lutz JoachimsenEye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDaily administration of 0.01% atropine eye drops is a promising approach for myopia control. The mechanism of action is believed to involve the dopaminergic system of the retina, triggering an increased release of dopamine. Previous studies in psychiatric condition such as major depression suggest that pattern electroretinogram (PERG) amplitudes are modulated by changes in retinal dopamine. It is thus plausible that atropine eye drops could have an effect on PERG amplitudes. The present study was designed to test this, assessing the difference in amplitude between contrast levels and the ratio of amplitudes between check sizes as primary endpoints.

methodsWe included 14 participants with no more than ± 2 diopters of ametropia and visual acuity of at least 1.0. One eye was chosen randomly in each participant for atropine application (14 days, one drop of 0.01% atropine solution once daily before bedtime). We recorded two sets of steady-state PERG recordings: one with different contrasts (25% and 98%) and one with different check sizes (0.8° and 17°). Near-point distance, near visual acuity, and pupil diameter were measured additionally.

resultsThe recordings to different contrasts did not show atropine-related changes of PERG amplitude. A small increase by 6% of the amplitude difference between contrast levels with atropine application was not significant (p = 0.08). Raw amplitudes in the check size condition increased with atropine by 17% (p < 0.01) and 10% (p < 0.03) for small and large checks, respectively, without a significant concomitant effect on the amplitude ratio. Pupil size was significantly affected (median increase 0.5 mm, p < 0.002). However, neither of the experimental conditions was associated with a significant correlation between pupil size and PERG effects.

conclusionThe effects on PERG primary endpoints after the 14-day period of atropine administration were small, especially compared to effect sizes in major depression, and statistically insignificant. Effects on raw amplitude were inconsistent. The present results suggest that retinal processing as reflected by PERG does not sizably change following a treatment regimen with atropine that is typical for myopia control.

Indexed as

AdultAtropineDopamineElectroretinographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMydriaticsMyopiaOphthalmic SolutionsRetinaVisual AcuityYoung AdultAtropineDopamineMydriaticsOphthalmic SolutionsAtropineDopamineMyopiaPattern electroretinogram

Identifiers

PMID30680489
OpenAlexW2912779140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.