Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680483›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2019

Anthropometric Scaling of Anatomical Datasets for Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Modelling of the Shoulder.

Christian Klemt, Daniel Nolte, Ziyun Ding, Lance Rane, Rebecca A Quest, Mary E Finnegan, Miny Walker, Peter Reilly, Anthony M J Bull

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian KlemtDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. c.klemt15@imperial.ac.uk.
Daniel NolteDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Ziyun DingDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Lance RaneDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Rebecca A QuestDepartment of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W6 8RF, UK.
Mary E FinneganDepartment of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W6 8RF, UK.
Miny WalkerDepartment of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Peter ReillyDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Anthony M J BullDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GB) EP/M507878/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linear scaling of generic shoulder models leads to substantial errors in model predictions. Customisation of shoulder modelling through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves modelling outcomes, but model development is time and technology intensive. This study aims to validate 10 MRI-based shoulder models, identify the best combinations of anthropometric parameters for model scaling, and quantify the improvement in model predictions of glenohumeral loading through anthropometric scaling from this anatomical atlas. The shoulder anatomy was modelled using a validated musculoskeletal model (UKNSM). Ten subject-specific models were developed through manual digitisation of model parameters from high-resolution MRI. Kinematic data of 16 functional daily activities were collected using a 10-camera optical motion capture system. Subject-specific model predictions were validated with measured muscle activations. The MRI-based shoulder models show good agreement with measured muscle activations. A tenfold cross-validation using the validated personalised shoulder models demonstrates that linear scaling of anthropometric datasets with the most similar ratio of body height to shoulder width and from the same gender (p < 0.04) yields best modelling outcomes in glenohumeral loading. The improvement in model reliability is significant (p < 0.02) when compared to the linearly scaled-generic UKNSM. This study may facilitate the clinical application of musculoskeletal shoulder modelling to aid surgical decision-making.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsShoulderAnatomical atlasAnthropometric scalingMagnetic resonance imagingMusculoskeletal shoulder modelSubject-specific shoulder modelling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.