ArticleEJNMMI research2019
Comparison of standardized uptake values between
Article in EJNMMI research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolving SPECT-CT technology.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Quantification in bone SPECT/CT.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis using standardized uptake value in single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- SPECT/CT imaging: quantifyingAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Quantification of [EJNMMI research · 2024Article
- Clinical performance of deep learning-enhanced ultrafast whole-body scintigraphy in patients with suspected malignancy.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Whole-Body SPECT/CT: Protocol Variation and Technical Consideration-A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Correlation between the maximum standard uptake value and mean Hounsfield unit on single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography to discriminate benign and metastatic lesions among patients with breast cancer.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- The potential advantages ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Quantitative vs. Qualitative SPECT-CT Diagnostic Accuracy in Bone Lesion Evaluation-A Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- [EJNMMI research · 2023Article
- Article
- The diagnostic value of quantitative bone SPECT/CT in solitary undetermined bone lesions.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Skeletal standardized uptake values obtained using quantitative SPECT/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Quantification of bone metabolic activity in the natural course of fractural lesions measured by quantitative SPECT/CT.Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2023Article
- Quantitative [EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT for the assessment of myocardial tracer uptake in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease: Initial experiences and results.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Optimization ofJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- What validation tests can be done by the clinical medical physicist while waiting for the standardization of quantitative SPECT/CT imaging?EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite recent technological advances allowing for quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative SPECT has not been widely used in the clinical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative SPECT for measuring metastatic bone uptake in breast and prostate cancer by comparing standard uptake values (SUVs) measured with
methodsTwenty-six breast and 27 prostate cancer patients at high risk of bone metastases underwent both
resultsA total of 231 skeletal lesions, 129 metastatic and 102 benign, were analyzed. All three SUV measures correlated very strongly between SPECT and PET (R
conclusionThe strong correlation between SUVs and similar SUVRs of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.