Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680448›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Comparison of changes in lean body mass with a strength- versus muscle endurance-based resistance training program.

Salvador Vargas, Jorge L Petro, Ramón Romance, Diego A Bonilla, Miguel Ángel Florido, Richard B Kreider, Brad J Schoenfeld, Javier Benítez-Porres

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Salvador VargasEADE-University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Málaga, Spain. salvadorvargasmolina@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6775-9159
Jorge L PetroResearch Group in Physical Activity, Sports and Health Sciences, Universidad de Córdoba, Montería, Colombia.
Ramón RomanceHuman Kinetics and Body Composition Laboratory, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Diego A BonillaResearch Group in Physical Activity, Sports and Health Sciences, Universidad de Córdoba, Montería, Colombia.
Miguel Ángel FloridoBetterbyScience, Málaga, Spain.
Richard B KreiderExercise and Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Brad J SchoenfeldDepartment of Health Sciences, CUNY Lehman College, New York, NY, USA.
Javier Benítez-PorresHuman Kinetics and Body Composition Laboratory, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain. benitez@uma.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7546-7965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of resistance training (RT) with an emphasis on either muscular strength-type RT or muscular endurance-type RT on measures of body composition.

methodsTwenty-five resistance-trained men (age 28.4 ± 6.4 years; body mass 75.9 ± 8.4 kg; height 176.9 ± 7.5 cm) were randomly assigned to either a strength-type RT group that performed three sets of 6-8 repetition maximum (RM) with 3-min rest (n = 10), an endurance-type RT group that performed three sets of 20-25 RM with a 60-s rest interval (n = 10), or a control group (n = 5, CG). All groups completed each set until muscular failure and were supervised to follow a hyperenergetic diet (39 kcal·kg

resultsAfter 8 weeks, we found significant increases in total body mass (0.9 [0.3-1.5] kg; p < 0.05; ES = < 0.2) and lean body mass (LBM) (1.3 [0.5-2.2] kg; p < 0.05; ES = 0.31) only in the strength-type RT group; however, no significant interactions were noted between groups.

conclusionsAlthough only strength-type RT showed statistically significant increases in LBM from baseline, no between-group differences were noted for any body composition outcome. These findings suggest that LBM gains in resistance trained are not significantly influenced by the type of training stimulus over an 8-week training period.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultBody CompositionBody Mass IndexHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPhysical EnduranceBody compositionExerciseFitnessPhysiologyTraining

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.